Perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity in a general practice population
- PMID: 10520145
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00436.x
Perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity in a general practice population
Abstract
Recent studies have attempted to determine the prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) in both hospital and general practice. Results indicate that DH prevalence is higher in patients referred for specialist treatment than in general practice. The aim of this study was to determine perception and prevalence of DH in general practice. Completed questionnaires from 277 patients (115 males, 162 females, mean age 41.7 years [SD 14.36]) were collected. Self-reported DH prevalence (52%) was observed between the third and fourth decades, peaking in the third and in good agreement with that previously published (45.2%), and significantly more females complained of DH than males (SND=2.24, 95% CI 0.01734-0.2661). Cold was perceived as the most common cause of DH, in agreement with other studies. Only 12.6% of patients reported periodontal surgery compared to 15.5% previously. Of those who received hygiene therapy (67.9%) only 15.5% reported DH following treatment which mainly did not last >/=5 days. Most patients with DH did not perceive the condition as severe and did not seek treatment (75.1%). Only 23.3% used a desensitizing dentifrice. The results indicated that self-reporting of DH is lower than reported in a dental hospital population and was not perceived as a major dental problem by most patients in a general dental practice population.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of dentine hypersensitivity in selected occidental and oriental populations.J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Jan;28(1):20-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00631.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2001. PMID: 11298905
-
A study of the prevalence and distribution of dentine sensitivity in a population of 17-58-year-old serving personnel on an RAF base in the Midlands.J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Jan;29(1):14-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00805.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2002. PMID: 11844027
-
Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist Periodontology Department.J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Nov;23(11):989-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00525.x. J Clin Periodontol. 1996. PMID: 8951625
-
A New Perspective on Dentine Hypersensitivity – Guidelines for General Dental Practice.Dent Update. 2017 Jan;44(1):33--6, 39-42. doi: 10.12968/denu.2017.44.1.33. Dent Update. 2017. PMID: 29172308 Review.
-
A cross-sectional study of buccal cervical sensitivity in UK general dental practice and a summary review of prevalence studies.Int J Dent Hyg. 2004 May;2(2):64-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5029.2004.00068.x. Int J Dent Hyg. 2004. PMID: 16451464 Review.
Cited by
-
Utilising daily diaries to examine oral health experiences associated with dentine hypersensitivity.BMC Oral Health. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0286-9. BMC Oral Health. 2016. PMID: 27634546 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge and Attitudes on Preventing and Treating Dentin Hypersensitivity and Its Predicting Factors: A Cross-sectional Study with Brazilian Citizens.Eur J Dent. 2023 Jul;17(3):855-862. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757905. Epub 2022 Dec 13. Eur J Dent. 2023. PMID: 36513338 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence, clinical features, and related factors of dentin hypersensitivity in the Turkish population.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2719-2732. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04245-4. Epub 2022 Jan 27. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 35083586
-
The Prevalence and Impact of Dentinal Hypersensitivity on Adults' Quality of Life in Saudi Arabia.Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 4;13(8):353. doi: 10.3390/dj13080353. Dent J (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40863056 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the northwest United States.J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Mar;144(3):288-96. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0116. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23449905 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical