Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 1999 Oct 16;319(7216):1069.

Routine antenatal HIV testing. Is justified in areas of low HIV prevalence

E Foley, V Harindra
Comment

Routine antenatal HIV testing. Is justified in areas of low HIV prevalence

E Foley et al. BMJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Postma MJ, Beck EJ, Mandalia S, Sherr L, Walters MDS, Houweling H, Jager JC. Universal HIV screening of pregnant women in England: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 1999;318:1656–1660. . (19 June.) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simpson WM, Johnstone FD, Goldberg DJ, Gormley SM, Hart GJ. Antenatal HIV testing: assessment of a routine voluntary approach. BMJ. 1999;318:1660–1661. . (19 June.) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson JMG, Junger JJ. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1968. p. 34.
    1. Simpson WM, Johnstone FD, Goldberg DJ, Gormley SM, Hart GJ. Antenatal HIV testing: assessment of a routine voluntary approach. BMJ. 1999;318:1660–1661. . (19 June.) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones S, Sadler T, Low N, Blott M, Welch J. Does uptake of antenatal HIV testing depend on the individual midwife? Cross sectional study. BMJ. 1998;316:272–273. - PMC - PubMed