Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Oct 12;53(6):1300-8.
doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.6.1300.

Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Brain activation during working memory 1 month after mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study

T W McAllister et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess patterns of regional brain activation in response to varying working memory loads shortly after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).

Background: Many individuals complain of memory difficulty shortly after MTBI. Memory performance in these individuals can be normal despite these complaints.

Methods: Brain activation patterns in response to a working memory task (auditory n-back) were assessed with functional MRI in 12 MTBI patients within 1 month of their injury and in 11 healthy control subjects.

Results: Brain activation patterns differed between MTBI patients and control subjects in response to increasing working memory processing loads. Maximum intensity projections of statistical parametric maps in control subjects showed bifrontal and biparietal activation in response to a low processing load, with little additional increase in activation associated with the high load task. MTBI patients showed some activation during the low processing load task but significantly increased activation during the high load condition, particularly in the right parietal and right dorsolateral frontal regions. Task performance did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion: MTBI patients differed from control subjects in activation pattern of working memory circuitry in response to different processing loads, despite similar task performance. This suggests that injury-related changes in ability to activate or to modulate working memory processing resources may underlie some of the memory complaints after MTBI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types