Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography
- PMID: 10525892
- DOI: 10.1007/s003300050911
Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography
Abstract
The aim of this study was comparative analysis of rejected radiographs in conventional and digital radiology under the aspects number of rejected images and reasons for rejection. During 2 months waste films of conventional radiography were collected; in digital radiography each image-delete command at the postprocessing workstation was documented. Rejected images were analysed and assigned to four categories. The overall reject rate was 27.6% in the conventional and 2.3% in the digital department. Whereas in the conventional department the main reason for rejection was "exposure" and "others" (i.e. problems related to film handling), the main reason in the digital environment was "positioning". The high exposure tolerance of digital systems markedly reduces the amount of faulty images. This is not only economically rewarding, but may also reduce unnecessary X-ray exposure of patients due to image retake.
Similar articles
-
Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2001;94(1-2):69-71. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006482. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2001. PMID: 11487846
-
Films reject analysis for conventional radiography in Iranian main hospitals.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Sep;147(1-2):220-2. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr306. Epub 2011 Jul 14. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011. PMID: 21764806
-
Reject analysis in direct digital radiography.Acta Radiol. 2012 Mar 1;53(2):174-8. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110350. Epub 2012 Jan 27. Acta Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22287147
-
Storage phosphor radiography.Eur Radiol. 1997;7 Suppl 3:S58-65. Eur Radiol. 1997. PMID: 9169103 Review.
-
Quality control of storage phosphor digital radiography systems.J Digit Imaging. 1995 May;8(2):67-74. doi: 10.1007/BF03168129. J Digit Imaging. 1995. PMID: 7612704 Review.
Cited by
-
Digital repeat analysis; setup and operation.J Digit Imaging. 2006 Jun;19(2):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s10278-005-8733-1. J Digit Imaging. 2006. PMID: 16421768 Free PMC article.
-
Image retake analysis in digital radiography using DICOM header information.J Digit Imaging. 2009 Aug;22(4):393-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9135-y. Epub 2008 Jul 1. J Digit Imaging. 2009. PMID: 18592314 Free PMC article.
-
Repeat analysis of intraoral digital imaging performed by undergraduate students using a complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor: An institutional case study.Imaging Sci Dent. 2017 Dec;47(4):233-239. doi: 10.5624/isd.2017.47.4.233. Epub 2017 Dec 12. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017. PMID: 29279822 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review.J Med Radiat Sci. 2014 Sep;61(3):176-90. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.66. Epub 2014 Aug 7. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014. PMID: 26229654 Free PMC article. Review.
-
One year's results from a server-based system for performing reject analysis and exposure analysis in computed radiography.J Digit Imaging. 2011 Apr;24(2):243-55. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9236-2. J Digit Imaging. 2011. PMID: 19885636 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources