Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1999 Nov;52(11):1015-21.
doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00077-3.

How to select a frail elderly population? A comparison of three working definitions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

How to select a frail elderly population? A comparison of three working definitions

M J Chin A Paw et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

Aim of this study was to compare three different working definitions for selecting a frail elderly population. Frailty was defined as inactivity combined with (1) low energy intake (n = 29), (2) weight loss (n = 26), or (3) low body mass index (n = 26). In the Zutphen Elderly Study (n = 450; age 69-89 years) differences in health, functioning, and diet in 1990 and functional decline and mortality in the following 3 years between "frail" and "nonfrail" participants, according to the working definitions, were studied using logistic regression analysis. Differences according to the inactivity/weight loss criterium were more pronounced than according to the other two criteria. Inactivity/weight loss was associated with lower subjective health and performance and more diseases and disabilities in 1990. Three-year relative risks of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 4.1, 1.8-9.4) and functional decline (OR: 5.2, 1.04-25.8 for disabilities, OR: 3.7, 0.8-16.2 for performance) were higher as well. Inactivity in combination with weight loss seems a practicable working definition for selecting a frail elderly population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources