Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Jul-Sep;64(3):114-21.

[Prognostic factors in 793 cases of gastric cancer in an oncologic referral center]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 10532138
Clinical Trial

[Prognostic factors in 793 cases of gastric cancer in an oncologic referral center]

[Article in Spanish]
L F Oñate-Ocaña et al. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 1999 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the 12-year experience with Gastric Cancer (GC), with special emphasis in prognostic factors.

Background: GC is the most common gastrointestinal malignancy and is the second cause of cancer-related mortality in Mexico. Poor results have been reported, and new treatments have not improved the life expectancy. The available information regarding GC in our country is limited.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 793 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated in an oncologic referral center in Mexico City. Demographic and clinical data, and the results of surgical treatment are presented. Survival curves by TNM stage and other prognostic factors are described.

Results: Sixty two percent of the patients presented in stage IV, with a median survival of 8.6 months. Only 33% of the whole group underwent surgical resection. One hundred and sixty two subtotal, 86 total and 12 proximal gastrectomies were performed, 74% with curative intention and in 26% for palliation. Operative morbidity and mortality were 23.3% and 10.9%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the independent prognostic factors were TNM stage (Risk ratio 1.49; 95% CI 1.26-1.76; p < 0.0001), operative morbidity (RR 6.05; 95% IC 3.74-9.7; p < 0.0001), seralbumin (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.03-1.5; p < 0.03), age (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.9-1.02; p < 0.057), type of lymphadenectomy (RR 1.59; 95% CI 0.97-2.59; p < 0.06) and gastrectomy performed (RR 1.9; IC 95% 0.9-4.2; p < 0.06).

Conclusion: The TNM staging system was the most important prognostic factor. The high rate of GC in advanced stages affects directly the results. Better survival may be expected if the relative frequency of stages I and II increase. Endoscopy is warranted to patients with dispeptic symptoms who present no response to treatment or recurrence. Our experience reflects the importance of this health problem in México.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources