An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department
- PMID: 1053498
An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department
Abstract
The care of obstetric patients in a university family medicine department was compared with that in the obstetrics-gynecology department of the same university. The obstetric service patients tended to be at higher risk due to a higher black population (24.2 percent vs 6.3 percent), greater prepregnancy weight (mean 154.0 lbs vs 113.9 lbs), and a greater number of patients referred from the community because of prenatal complications. However, the family medicine patients had a higher incidence of premature rupture of membranes (26 percent vs 11 percent), and were therefore at risk for several complications. Family medicine nulliparas had first stages of labor which lasted an average of 12.2 hours as opposed to obstetric service nulliparas whose first stages averaged only 9.2 hours. There were more family medicine than obstetric service patients who received no anesthesia (18.0 percent vs 10.2 percent). Elective low forceps were used more often by obstetric service physicians than by family physicians (28.2 percent vs 15.3 percent). Mothers on the family medicine service had more puerperal complications than those on the obstetric service (16.0 percent vs 5.6 percent). No serious discrepancies in quality of care could be found between the two services.
Similar articles
-
Medical audit. General practitioner obstetrics in a small rural hospital.N Z Med J. 1981 Feb 25;93(678):126-9. N Z Med J. 1981. PMID: 6943456
-
Is maternity care different in family practice? A pilot matched pair study.J Fam Pract. 1987 Sep;25(3):237-42. J Fam Pract. 1987. PMID: 3305766 Clinical Trial.
-
Adverse perinatal outcomes: is physician specialty a risk factor?J Fam Pract. 1987 Feb;24(2):152-6. J Fam Pract. 1987. PMID: 3806026
-
Obstetric audit and its implications for obstetric anaesthesia.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;24(3):413-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 13. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010. PMID: 20071243 Review.
-
Maternal early warning systems.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;42(2):289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.006. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26002167 Review.
Cited by
-
Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.CMAJ. 1989 Mar 15;140(6):637-43. CMAJ. 1989. PMID: 2920337 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.CMAJ. 1989 Mar 15;140(6):625-33. CMAJ. 1989. PMID: 2920336 Free PMC article.
-
Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.Am J Public Health. 1997 Mar;87(3):344-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.344. Am J Public Health. 1997. PMID: 9096532 Free PMC article.
-
Referral pattern and rate of intervention in a small rural obstetrical practice.Can Fam Physician. 1986 Oct;32:2141-6. Can Fam Physician. 1986. PMID: 21267315 Free PMC article.
-
Training for primary care: a family practice perspective.West J Med. 1982 Jan;136(1):83-4. West J Med. 1982. PMID: 7072247 Free PMC article. No abstract available.