Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure in pregnancy
- PMID: 10535435
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1447
Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure in pregnancy
Erratum in
- JAMA 2000 May 3;283(17):2241
Abstract
Context: Elevated blood pressure (BP) measured at the physician's office may reflect true hypertension or white coat hypertension (WCH). The prognostic value of WCH among pregnant women is unknown.
Objective: To assess the prognostic value of WCH in pregnancy.
Design: Prospective cohort study conducted between September 1994 and October 1997.
Setting: Community hospital.
Patients: Women without preexisting hypertension and not treated with antihypertensive drugs aid with high (n = 148) or normal (n = 106) office BP (high office BP was defined as > or =140 mm Hg systolic and/or > or =90 mm Hg diastolic) matched for gestational age during their third trimester of pregnancy. All women underwent 24-hour noninvasive BP monitoring, and women without hypertension on 24-hour monitoring (125/74 mm Hg or less for average 24-hour BP) with office hypertension were classified as having WCH. Women were followed up through the end of pregnancy.
Main outcome measures: Duration of pregnancy, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia or eclampsia, cesarean delivery, placental and neonatal weight, and length of maternal and neonatal hospital stays for those with and without elevated office BP.
Results: After application of exclusion criteria, data for 7 women were removed from the analysis. For the remaining subjects, in the group with elevated BP, prevalence of WCH was 29.2% (42/144). Duration of pregnancy was similar in the normotensive and WCH groups (39.6 vs 39.8 weeks; P = .50), but shorter (38.3 weeks; P<.001) in the true hypertension group. Incidence of preeclampsia was similar in the normotensive and WCH groups (5.8% vs 7.1 %; P = .86) but higher in the true hypertension group (61.7%; P<.001). Frequency of cesarean delivery was lower in the normotensive (12.4%) than in the WCH (45.2%; P = .008) and true hypertension (41.1 %; P = .009) groups. Neonatal weight was lower (P<.001) in the true hypertension (mean, 2911 g) than in the normotensive (3336 g) and WCH groups (3435 g), which did not differ (P = .68). The duration of neonatal hospital stay did not differ between the normotensive and the WCH group (5.3 vs 6.9 days; P = .13) but was longer in the true hypertension group (12.3 days; P<.001).
Conclusions: In women with elevated BP during their third trimester of pregnancy, 24-hour BP was superior to office BP (distinguishing true hypertension from WCH) for prediction of the outcome of pregnancy. Outcomes in the normotensive and WCH group were comparable, but the increased incidence of cesarean delivery in the WCH group may reflect decision-making processes influenced by office BP.
Similar articles
-
The natural history of white coat hypertension during pregnancy.BJOG. 2005 May;112(5):601-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00516.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 15842284
-
Prognostic value of office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in pregnancy.Hypertension. 2002 Sep;40(3):298-303. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000028978.99648.d0. Hypertension. 2002. PMID: 12215470 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term prognostic value of white coat hypertension: an insight from diagnostic use of both ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements.Hypertension. 2013 Jul;62(1):168-74. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00690. Epub 2013 May 28. Hypertension. 2013. PMID: 23716584
-
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of White Coat Hypertension During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Hypertension. 2020 Jul;76(1):157-166. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14627. Epub 2020 May 26. Hypertension. 2020. PMID: 32450741
-
The clinical significance of white-coat and masked hypertension.Blood Press Monit. 2007 Dec;12(6):387-9. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32824958e5. Blood Press Monit. 2007. PMID: 18277317 Review.
Cited by
-
The Blood Pressure "Uncertainty Range" - a pragmatic approach to overcome current diagnostic uncertainties (II).Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2005 Apr 6;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1468-6708-6-5. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2005. PMID: 15813971 Free PMC article.
-
Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British hypertension society.BMJ. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1128-34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1128. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10775227 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice.Indian Heart J. 2019 Jan-Feb;71(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Nov 27. Indian Heart J. 2019. PMID: 31000190 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Periodontal Inflamed Surface Area Is Associated With Increased Gestational Blood Pressure and Uric Acid Levels Among Pregnant Women From Rural North China.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 1;9:830732. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.830732. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35299983 Free PMC article.
-
Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.Hypertension. 2008 Jul;52(1):10-29. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.189010. Epub 2008 May 22. Hypertension. 2008. PMID: 18497370 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical