Involvement of peripheral NMDA and non-NMDA receptors in development of persistent firing of spinal wide-dynamic-range neurons induced by subcutaneous bee venom injection in the cat

Abstract

To study the roles of peripheral excitatory amino acids receptor subtypes N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptors in persistent nociception, extracellular single unit recording technique was used to assess the effects of a single dose NMDA and non-NMDA receptor antagonists, AP(5) (5-aminophosphonovaleric acid) and CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione) or DNQX (6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione), on s.c. bee venom-induced increase in firing of wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neurons in the spinal dorsal horn of the urethane-chloralose anesthetized cats. Subcutaneous bee venom injection into the cutaneous receptive field resulted in a single phase of increased firing of WDR neurons over the background activity for more than 1 h. Local pre-administration of AP(5) (200 microg/100 microl) or CNQX (8.3 microg/100 microl) into the bee venom injection site produced 94% (1.01+/-0.96 spikes/s, n=5) or 76% (2.97+/-0.58 spikes/s, n=4) suppression of the increased neuronal firing when compared with local saline (16.32+/-4.55 spikes/s, n=10) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (12.37+/-6.36 spikes/s, n=4) pre-treated group, respectively. Local post-administration of the same dose of AP(5) produced a similar result to the pre-treatment group with a 67% inhibition of the mean firing rate, however, the same treatment with CNQX and even a higher dose of DNQX (100 microg/100 microl) did not produce any inhibition of the neuronal firing induced by s.c. bee venom injection (DNQX vs. DMSO: 23.91+/-0. 25 vs. 22.14+/-0.04 spikes/s, P=0.0298, n=5). In the control experiments, local pre-administration of the same dose of AP(5) or CNQX into a region on the contralateral hindpaw symmetrical to the bee venom injection site produced no significant influence on the increased firing of the WDR neurons [contralateral AP(5) vs. saline: 14.17+/-6.27 spikes/s (n=5) vs. 16.32+/-4.55 spikes/s (n=10), P0.05; contralateral CNQX vs. DMSO: 12.85+/-6.38 spikes/s (n=4) vs. 12. 37+/-6.36 spikes/s (n=4), P0.05], implicating that the suppressive action of local AP(5) or CNQX was not the result of systemic effects. The present results suggest that activation of the peripheral NMDA receptors is involved in both induction and maintenance, while activation of non-NMDA receptors is only involved in induction, but not in the maintenance of persistent firing of the dorsal horn WDR neurons induced by s.c. bee venom injection.