Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Mar;15(3):217-28.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915030-00002.

Pharmacoeconomic consequences of variable patient compliance with prescribed drug regimens

Affiliations
Review

Pharmacoeconomic consequences of variable patient compliance with prescribed drug regimens

J Urquhart. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Mar.

Abstract

Variable compliance with prescribed drug regimens is a leading source of variability in drug response. Specifics differ by drug and disease. The role of variable compliance was clearly defined in 2 trials of lipid-lowering agents, cholestyramine and gemfibrozil, in which exceptionally careful measurements of compliance were made, which has not been done in later trials. Economic consequences of variable compliance are estimated by converting dose-dependent changes in absolute risk of incident coronary disease into the unicohort format, which designates how many patients must be treated to prevent, in a given time, a defined 'coronary event'. Two strong influences on the costs of treatment are: (i) the shape of the relation between drug intake and risk reduction; and (ii) the strength of the linkage between intake and prescription refills. The intake-effect relation for cholestyramine is linear, making compliance-neutral the cost to prevent 1 coronary event, provided that refills match intake. If refills exceed intake, treatment costs rise. The intake-effect relation for gemfibrozil is more typically nonlinear, so poorer compliers purchase and take the drug in amounts that have little benefit, increasing the cost to prevent 1 coronary event. If refills run at a higher rate than intake, costs increase still further. A key question for future study is: do policies that encourage timely refills increase compliance enough to offset their potential to waste money in the purchasing of an untaken drug?

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 16;333(20):1301-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992 Mar;22(3):238-46 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 1998 Feb 15;17(3):303-17 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Jan;57(1):6-15 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1964 Feb;60:SUPPL 5:68-86 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources