[Mini-invasive surgery of the retroperitoneal space in children]

Abstract

Although laparoscopic surgery now represents today an essential surgical technique, its use remains limited in urology and especially in pediatric urology for many reasons, main because of the lack of indications. After a large experience acquired in abdominal laparoscopic surgery, and because we were convinced of the advantages offered by this new mini-invasive approach, we have tried to develop it for the retroperitoneal space.

Methods: Over a five-year period we performed 88 retroperitoneal procedures in children:--50 nephrectomies (44 total, 10 partial) for the following indications: 15 polycystic dysplastic kidney, 13 kidney destroyed by reflux, 18 by obstruction, hypertensive uropathy 3, pyonephrosis 1.--5 renal cystectomies, 3 pyelolithotomies, 2 pyeloureteral obstructions, 2 adrenalectomies, 1 retrocaval ureter, 25 varicoceles. The age range was 2 months to 16 years (mean: 3.7 years, 25 children under 1 year). The patients were placed in the lateral debubitus. The retroperitoneal space was created by dissection under direct vision, then insufflation was performed directly in the retroperitoneal space without balloon. Three or four ports were used except for varicocelectomy which was performed with only one port and an operating channel telescope.

Results: Follow-up range was 6 months to 5 years. The mean operating time was 96 minutes (35 to 210 min.). Average postoperative stay was 2 days. Conversion was needed in 7 cases (8%). Operative incidents consisted of one duodenal perforation, one ureteral burn, 21 peritoneal perforations (24%). There were 5 postoperative complications (2 urinomas after partial nephrectomy, 1 hydrocele, 1 varicocele recurrence, 1 recurrent stones) not related to the technique. 3 cases needed reoperation (ureteral injury, varicocele recurrence, recurrence of cystine stones) with good result.

Conclusion: Like other laparoscopic techniques, retroperitoneoscopy requires a training: it remains delicate in children because of the reduced working space and the fragility of the peritoneum. However the advantages seem sufficiently obvious for us to recommend and promote this procedure.