Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty
- PMID: 10546611
Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
In 99 patients, 107 knee replacements were revised in two centers by two surgeons using a single revision total knee arthroplasty system. A retrospective radiographic review of joint line position before and after revision total knee arthroplasty was made, and compared with the joint line position before primary knee arthroplasty. Prospectively collected Knee Society Clinical Rating Scores were correlated with radiographic findings. The joint line position in unreplaced knee replacements averaged 16 mm, and the joint line position in knee replacements before revision surgery averaged 17 mm. The joint line was elevated by the revision total knee arthroplasty in 85 of 107 knees (79%). After the revision total knee replacement, the joint line elevation averaged 24 mm. The Knee Society Clinical Rating Score after revision surgery averaged 131 points. If the joint line position was elevated more than 8 mm, the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score averaged 125 points, if the joint line was elevated less than 8 mm, the score averaged 141 points. Joint line elevation after revision total knee replacement is a problem. Excessive elevation may result in worse clinical outcomes. Distal femoral augments should be used more often and with greater thicknesses. Standard implants used for revision surgery should have increased distal dimensions.
Similar articles
-
Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement?J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jul;90(7):879-84. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20566. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008. PMID: 18591596
-
Clinical and radiographic analysis of accurate restoration of the joint line in revision total knee arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2006 Dec;21(8):1154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.026. J Arthroplasty. 2006. PMID: 17162175
-
Revision of the unstable total knee arthroplasty: outcome predictors.J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.028. Epub 2011 Apr 19. J Arthroplasty. 2011. PMID: 21507608
-
Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2002 Dec;17(8):967-77. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.35823. J Arthroplasty. 2002. PMID: 12478505
-
The reliability of adductor tubercle as an anatomical landmark for joint line restoration in revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):71. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3681. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 33553364 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Accurate determination of post-operative 3D component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: the AURORA protocol.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Oct 30;13(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0957-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 30376865 Free PMC article.
-
Posterior condylar offset is an independent predictor of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty.Bone Joint Res. 2017 Mar;6(3):172-178. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.63.BJR-2015-0021.R1. Bone Joint Res. 2017. PMID: 28360083 Free PMC article.
-
The medial tibial joint line elevation over 5 mm restrained the improvement of knee extension angle in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1737-1742. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4763-8. Epub 2017 Nov 9. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 29124288
-
Good clinical and radiographic outcome of cementless metal metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty.Acta Orthop. 2018 Feb;89(1):84-88. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1398013. Epub 2017 Nov 6. Acta Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29105554 Free PMC article.
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Apr;13(3):167-73. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0507-7. Epub 2004 Apr 8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005. PMID: 15071726
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical