The evaluation of hypersensitivity tests in cattle after foot-and-mouth disease vaccination
- PMID: 1054725
- PMCID: PMC2130375
- DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400024232
The evaluation of hypersensitivity tests in cattle after foot-and-mouth disease vaccination
Abstract
The response to passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, dermal hypersensitivity and intravenous provocation tests has been compared in 30, 40, 31 and 24 cattle injected with foot-and-mouth disease vaccine 0, 1, 2 and 3 times respectively, using vaccine components and other substances as test materials. Reaginic antibodies demonstrated by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in goats, were directed against BHK 21 cell extracts (20), hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (3) and an unidentified vaccine component (3), and distributed in 0, 5, 19 and 75 per cent of the cattle vaccinated 0, 1, 2 and 3 times. None of the animals showed clinical signs of allergy after vaccination. When BHK 21 cell extract was injected intradermally a significant correlation was noted between the development of large weals and the presence of reagins although the size of the weals was not correlated with the reagin titres. In the case of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose a similar trend was evident. The majority of cattle with large dermal weals possessed reagins but the number of reactions was too small for statistical evaluation. Dermal reactions to sodium penicillin, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, saponin and whole vaccine occurred in both unvaccinated and vaccinated cattle but BHK 21 cell lysate and normal bovine serum provoked weals which increased in frequency according to the number of vaccinations experienced. Intravenous hydroxypropylmethylcellulose elicited a response in all the animals previously injected with certain batches of vaccine but cell extract intravenously produced a clinical response in half the tested animals which was uncorrelated with the results of the passive cutaneous anaphylaxis or dermal hypersensitivity tests.
Similar articles
-
Hypersensitivity in cattle after foot-and-mouth disease vaccination: response to hydroxpropylmethylcellulose.J Hyg (Lond). 1975 Aug;75(1):79-86. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400047082. J Hyg (Lond). 1975. PMID: 168252 Free PMC article.
-
Allergy in cattle after foot-and-mouth disease vaccination.Vet Rec. 1977 Mar 5;100(10):195-8. doi: 10.1136/vr.100.10.195. Vet Rec. 1977. PMID: 193234
-
Reaginic antibody in cattle hypersensitised by foot-and-mouth disease vaccine.Res Vet Sci. 1975 Jul;19(1):1-7. Res Vet Sci. 1975. PMID: 50615
-
Application of non-structural protein antibody tests in substantiating freedom from foot-and-mouth disease virus infection after emergency vaccination of cattle.Vaccine. 2006 Oct 30;24(42-43):6503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.032. Epub 2006 Jul 5. Vaccine. 2006. PMID: 16872727 Review.
-
A Review of OIE Country Status Recovery Using Vaccinate-to-Live Versus Vaccinate-to-Die Foot-and-Mouth Disease Response Policies I: Benefits of Higher Potency Vaccines and Associated NSP DIVA Test Systems in Post-Outbreak Surveillance.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015 Aug;62(4):367-87. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12166. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015. PMID: 24112127 Review.
Cited by
-
Increased Virulence of Culicoides Midge Cell-Derived Bluetongue Virus in IFNAR Mice.Viruses. 2024 Sep 17;16(9):1474. doi: 10.3390/v16091474. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 39339950 Free PMC article.
-
Potential allergens in oil emulsion foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for pigs.Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Oct;101(2):477-80. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800054431. Epidemiol Infect. 1988. PMID: 2846332 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Hypersensitivity in cattle after foot-and-mouth disease vaccination: response to hydroxpropylmethylcellulose.J Hyg (Lond). 1975 Aug;75(1):79-86. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400047082. J Hyg (Lond). 1975. PMID: 168252 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources