Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Nov 6;319(7219):1241-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1241.

Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients

R Jones  1 , J Pearson, S McGregor, A J Cawsey, A Barrett, N Craig, J M Atkinson, W H Gilmour, J McEwen
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients

R Jones et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the use and effect of a computer based information system for cancer patients that is personalised using each patient's medical record with a system providing only general information and with information provided in booklets.

Design: Randomised trial with three groups. Data collected at start of radiotherapy, one week later (when information provided), three weeks later, and three months later.

Participants: 525 patients started radical radiotherapy; 438 completed follow up.

Interventions: Two groups were offered information via computer (personalised or general information, or both) with open access to computer thereafter; the third group was offered a selection of information booklets.

Outcomes: Patients' views and preferences, use of computer and information, and psychological status; doctors' perceptions; cost of interventions.

Results: More patients offered the personalised information said that they had learnt something new, thought the information was relevant, used the computer again, and showed their computer printouts to others. There were no major differences in doctors' perceptions of patients. More of the general computer group were anxious at three months. With an electronic patient record system, in the long run the personalised information system would cost no more than the general system. Full access to booklets cost twice as much as the general system.

Conclusions: Patients preferred computer systems that provided information from their medical records to systems that just provided general information. This has implications for the design and implementation of electronic patient record systems and reliance on general sources of patient information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of patients through trial
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of data displayed by computer information systems
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of data displayed by computer information systems
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of data displayed by computer information systems
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of data displayed by computer information systems
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of data displayed by computer information systems
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of data displayed by computer information systems
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. National Cancer Alliance. Patient-centred cancer services? What patients say. Oxford: National Cancer Alliance; 1996.
    1. Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S. No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 1995;4:197–202. - PubMed
    1. Meredith C, Symonds P, Webster L, Lamont D, Pyper E, Gillis CR, et al. Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views. BMJ. 1996;313:724–726. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris KA. The informational needs of patients with cancer and their families. Cancer Pract. 1998;6:39–46. - PubMed
    1. Bental DS, Cawsey AJ, Jones R. Patient information systems that tailor to the individual. Patient Educ Counsel. 1999;36:171–180. - PubMed

Publication types