Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Aug;21(4):553-8.
doi: 10.1076/jcen.21.4.553.878.

Convergent and discriminant validity of the CVLT (dementia version). California Verbal Learning Test

Affiliations

Convergent and discriminant validity of the CVLT (dementia version). California Verbal Learning Test

J L Woodard et al. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999 Aug.

Abstract

This study investigated the convergent and discriminant validity of the 9-item "dementia version'' of the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-9) in a sample of 130 geriatric patients evaluated for memory complaints. Moderate correlations were observed between the CVLT-9 sum of words recalled for trials 1-5 (Trial 1-5 Recall) and Long-Delay Free Recall (LDFR) measures and the immediate and delayed Logical Memory (LM I and LM II) and Visual Reproduction (VR I and VR II) subtests from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R). However, the CVLT-9 Trial 1-5 Recall and VR I measures demonstrated significant correlations with a number of additional measures of language and visuospatial ability. The CVLT-9 LDFR, and the WMS-R LM I, LM II, and VR II showed less overlap with non-episodic memory functioning. A principal components analysis yielded a three-component solution consisting of a general or "g'' component, a specific memory component, and a mood component. The CVLT-9 Trial 1-5 Recall and VR I loaded on both the "g'' and the memory components, whereas LM I, LM II, and VR II loaded on only the memory component. We conclude that the CVLT-9 Trial 1-5 Recall and VR I demonstrate low discriminant validity, suggesting diminished specificity as memory measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources