Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Oct;58(4):589-607.
doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958040-00002.

Antibiotic usage in animals: impact on bacterial resistance and public health

Affiliations
Review

Antibiotic usage in animals: impact on bacterial resistance and public health

A E van den Bogaard et al. Drugs. 1999 Oct.

Abstract

Antibiotic use whether for therapy or prevention of bacterial diseases, or as performance enhancers will result in antibiotic resistant micro-organisms, not only among pathogens but also among bacteria of the endogenous microflora of animals. The extent to which antibiotic use in animals will contribute to the antibiotic resistance in humans is still under much debate. In addition to the veterinary use of antibiotics, the use of these agents as antimicrobial growth promoters (AGP) greatly influences the prevalence of resistance in animal bacteria and a poses risk factor for the emergence of antibiotic resistance in human pathogens. Antibiotic resistant bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp. and enterococci from animals can colonise or infect the human population via contact (occupational exposure) or via the food chain. Moreover, resistance genes can be transferred from bacteria of animals to human pathogens in the intestinal flora of humans. In humans, the control of resistance is based on hygienic measures: prevention of cross contamination and a decrease in the usage of antibiotics. In food animals housed closely together, hygienic measures, such as prevention of oral-faecal contact, are not feasible. Therefore, diminishing the need for antibiotics is the only possible way of controlling resistance in large groups of animals. This can be achieved by improvement of animal husbandry systems, feed composition and eradication of or vaccination against infectious diseases. Moreover, abolishing the use of antibiotics as feed additives for growth promotion in animals bred as a food source for humans would decrease the use of antibiotics in animals on a worldwide scale by nearly 50%. This would not only diminish the public health risk of dissemination of resistant bacteria or resistant genes from animals to humans, but would also be of major importance in maintaining the efficacy of antibiotics in veterinary medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Sep 1;211(5):590-2 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):590-3 - PubMed
    1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Sep;40(3):454-6 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Infect Dis. 1988;20(5):573 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Oct;40(10):2285-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources