Current strategies in the treatment of invasive Aspergillus infections in immunocompromised patients
- PMID: 10551434
- DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199958040-00004
Current strategies in the treatment of invasive Aspergillus infections in immunocompromised patients
Abstract
Aspergillus infections have a very high mortality rate. Their incidence is growing because of the increasing number of immunocompromised patients. Treatment of Aspergillus infection is difficult, and the agents used have numerous adverse effects and toxicities. Recently, new and less nephrotoxic formulations of amphotericin B have come onto the market and other new drugs, such as voriconazole and terbinafine, are under evaluation for this infection. Restoration of host immune defences by tapering of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant patients or correction of granulocytopenia in haematological disease is the cornerstone of modern treatment of aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. In patients with invasive aspergillosis it is very important to achieve therapeutic concentrations of antimycotic drugs as quickly as possible. Patients at high risk of developing aspergillosis (e.g. those with granulocytopenia) should be treated on the basis of clinical or radiological criteria alone if microbiological or histological diagnosis would significantly delay treatment. Conventional amphotericin B is still the first-line treatment for patients with invasive aspergillosis. In transplant patients receiving other nephrotoxic drugs, particularly cyclosporin, first-line therapy with one of the new amphotericin B formulations should be considered. If the emergence of renal toxicity in any patient precludes aggressive treatment, the patient should be switched to one of the new formulations of amphotericin B. For patients cured with amphotericin B, secondary prophylaxis is needed at the end of the intravenous therapy. Amphotericin B by aerosol or itraconazole are possible solutions. In non-invasive forms of aspergillosis, such as suppurative bronchitis, patients could be treated either with amphotericin B or itraconazole as first-line therapy.
Similar articles
-
Invasive aspergillosis. Disease spectrum, treatment practices, and outcomes. I3 Aspergillus Study Group.Medicine (Baltimore). 2000 Jul;79(4):250-60. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200007000-00006. Medicine (Baltimore). 2000. PMID: 10941354
-
[Guideline based treatment of invasive aspergillosis].Mycoses. 2010 May;53 Suppl 1:36-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01840.x. Mycoses. 2010. PMID: 20433655 German.
-
[Epidemiology and therapy of mycotic infections in immunocompromised host with special regard to the role of lipid formulations of amphotericin B].Recenti Prog Med. 1999 Oct;90(10):545-57. Recenti Prog Med. 1999. PMID: 10592741 Review. Italian.
-
[Treatment of invasive aspergillosis].Mycoses. 1994;37 Suppl 2:20-6. Mycoses. 1994. PMID: 7609739 Review. German.
-
Voriconazole: new preparation. Invasive aspergillosis: benefits to be confirmed.Prescrire Int. 2004 Feb;13(69):13-6. Prescrire Int. 2004. PMID: 15055210
Cited by
-
Successful treatment of an Aspergillus brain abscess with caspofungin: case report of a diabetic patient intolerant of amphotericin B.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Sep;22(9):575-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-0991-6. Epub 2003 Aug 21. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003. PMID: 12938012 No abstract available.
-
Caspofungin: a review of its use in oesophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis.Drugs. 2003;63(20):2235-63. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363200-00008. Drugs. 2003. PMID: 14498760 Review.
-
An economic evaluation of voriconazole versus amphotericin B for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in Canada.Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2004 Sep;15(5):277-84. doi: 10.1155/2004/183087. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 18159506 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical