Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Sep-Oct;9(5):521-9.
doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500048.

The EL sampler: a press sampler for the quantitative estimation of dermal exposure to pesticides in housedust

Affiliations

The EL sampler: a press sampler for the quantitative estimation of dermal exposure to pesticides in housedust

R D Edwards et al. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1999 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Indirect sampling techniques to estimate dermal exposure to pesticides on housedust-laden indoor surfaces should demonstrate collection efficiencies, for both particles and pesticide residues, which are similar to those that would adhere to the human skin. A spring-loaded press sampler has been developed that approximated the particle- and pesticide-collection efficiencies of a hand press of a human participant. Particle-collection efficiencies for the hand press and EL sampler, using housedust sieved to <250 microm in diameter, indicated that both sampling techniques collected similar particle fractions over the range of particle sizes. Pesticide-collection efficiencies measured on the participants hand (seven paired tests) were 42+/-7% atrazine, 29+/-8% diazinon, 43+/-8% malathion and 21+/-5% chlorpyrifos. The EL sampler collected 35+/-5%, 31+/-3%, 32+/-5% and 18+/-3% respectively. The collection efficiencies of the two sampling techniques were highly correlated for atrazine, diazinon, and chlorpyrifos (correlation coefficient=0.840, 0.815, and 0.706), but not for malathion (correlation coefficient=0.086).

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types