Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Nov;52(12):1001-4.

[Optimum anticoagulation control after bileaflet mechanical valve replacement: a prospective multi-institutional study]

[Article in Japanese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 10554485
Clinical Trial

[Optimum anticoagulation control after bileaflet mechanical valve replacement: a prospective multi-institutional study]

[Article in Japanese]
M Kitamura et al. Kyobu Geka. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess optimum anticoagulation control after bileaflet mechanical valve replacement by using the international normalized ratio of prothrombin time (PT-INR). From January to December 1995, 261 patients (pts) underwent mechanical valve replacement in the aortic (n = 95), mitral (n = 126), aortomitral (n = 39) or isolated tricuspid (n = 1) valve position in 8 medical centers in Tokyo, Japan. The St. Jude Medical valves were implanted in 184 pts and the Carbomedics valves in 77. There were 17 valve-related events as follows: 11 thromboembolic events (3.62%/pt-yr) including 10 transient ischemic attacks. 5 non-fatal bleeding events (1.65%/pt-yr), 2 reoperations (0.66%/pt-yr). At 18 postoperative months, free rates from all deaths (actuarial survival) thromboembolism, reoperation and all valve-related events were 95.3%, 95.7%, 98.7% and 88.9%, respectively. Under anticoagulant therapy, thrombin-antithrombin III complex and D-dimmer remained in high levels at 1 month after operation, and both values decreased to the control level at 6 months. In patients with thromboembolic events, PT-INR tended to be less than 2.0. The patients with bleeding events showed some increase of PT-INP or received anti-platelet agents. The 5 to 95 percentile of PT-INR at 6 months was 1.2 to 3.0 in the patients without valve-related events. These results suggested that optimum range of PT-INR might be between 1.2 and 3.0 after bileaflet mechanical valve replacement in patients without high risk of thromboembolism and between 2.0 and 3.0 in patients with the high risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources