Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Nov;57(11):1288-94; discussion 1295-6.
doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90861-3.

Patients' perception of recovery after third molar surgery

Affiliations

Patients' perception of recovery after third molar surgery

S M Conrad et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated patients' perceptions of recovery after third molar surgery.

Methods: Two hundred forty-nine patients (age 13 to 37 years) at 2 clinical centers were enrolled in a prospective study before the surgical removal of third molars. Each patient was given a 21-item Health-Related Quality of Life instrument (HRQOL) to be completed each postoperative day (POD) for 14 days. The instrument was designed to assess patients' perception of recovery: pain, oral function, general activity measures, and other symptoms. Pain dimensions were recorded with a 7-point Likert-type scale; all other conditions were measured on 5-point Likert-type scales. The impact of each predictor variable such as age, gender, and length of surgery on recovery was assessed with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics, controlling for clinical center.

Results: After the 14-day postoperative period, 201 of the original 249 patients returned the completed HRQOL instrument; the 48 patients who did not return their diary had third molar conditions and surgery similar to the 201 patients who responded. On POD 1, 63.5% of patients reported their worst pain as severe (score, 5 to 7/7) at some time during the day. By POD 7, only 15% of patients reported their worst pain as severe. Average pain levels were much less; 29% reported their average pain as severe (score, 5 to 7/7) on POD 1, decreasing to 5.5% by POD 7. Patients experienced substantial interference in oral function; chewing, 85%; mouth opening 78.5%, and speaking 37.5% on POD 1. By POD 6, oral function had improved; chewing, 19%, mouth opening, 15%; and speaking, 1.5%. General measures also were affected on POD 1; social activity, 61.5%; recreation, 70.5%; and daily routine, 60%. Patients assumed a more normal lifestyle by POD 5. Swelling seemed to be at its maximum on PODs 1 and 2 (day 1, 53%; day 2, 61%) and decreased markedly by POD 5 (10%). Food collection in the surgical sites posed the biggest problem for patients on POD 9 (20%). Age was not a predictor of prolonged recovery. However, surgery time 30 minutes or longer, or having all third molars below the occlusal plane, did prolong recovery. Females also reported a longer recovery period.

Conclusions: This information is valuable to patients deciding on third molar surgery and to clinicians providing informed consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources