High-versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34(+) immunoselection
- PMID: 10561272
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2160
High-versus standard-dose filgrastim (rhG-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral-blood progenitor cells from allogeneic donors and CD34(+) immunoselection
Abstract
Purpose: The efficacy of a high- versus a standard-dose filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or rhG-CSF) regimen to mobilize peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for allogeneic transplantation was investigated in 75 healthy donors.
Patients and methods: From December 1994 to December 1997, 75 consecutive donors (median age, 38 years; range, 17 to 67 years) were assigned to two different schedules of rhG-CSF for PBPC mobilization. Fifty donors received 24 microg rhG-CSF/kg body weight (BW) divided into two daily subcutaneous injections (two doses of 12 microg, group A), whereas 25 were treated with 10 microg rhG-CSF once daily (group B). Apheresis was started on day 4 in group A and on day 5 in group B. Target CD34(+) cell numbers in apheresis products were >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW.
Results: Cytokine priming and collection of PBPCs were equally well tolerated in both groups. Significantly higher CD34(+) cell numbers in group A with 3. 7 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.47 x 10(6)/L apheresis) compared with 2 x 10(6)/kg recipient BW/apheresis (0.25 x 10(6)/L apharesis) in group B were obtained (P <.05). Using standard aphereses (median, 9 L), two doses of 12 microg rhG-CSF/kg allowed collection of >/= 4 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells with two aphereses (range, one to three) in group A versus three aphereses (range, one to six) in group B (P <.015). Donor age, sex, and BW influenced the collection of CD34(+) cell numbers: in particular, significantly higher apheresis results were obtained in donors younger than 40 years compared with donors older than 40 years of age (P <.05). In 65 CD34(+) selection procedures using avidin-biotin immunoabsorption columns (Ceprate SC System, CellPro, Bothell, WA), a median CD34(+) purity of 53%, CD34(+) recovery of 40%, and the collection of 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells/selection were achieved. In group A with higher CD34(+) cells/kg/apheresis, CD34(+) purity, recovery, and cell yields were 60%, 45%, and 2.3 x 10(6)/kg/selection, respectively, as compared with 48%, 31%, and 0.7 x 10(6)/kg in group B (P <.05).
Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that twice daily rhG-CSF (two doses of 12 microg/kg BM) compared with once daily rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg BW), in addition to being well tolerated, significantly improves PBPC mobilization, allows the collection of higher numbers of CD34(+) cells with one or two standard aphereses, and facilitates subsequent selection procedures in healthy allogeneic donors.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of stem cell apheresis products using intermediate-dose filgrastim plus large volume apheresis for allogeneic transplantation.Ann Hematol. 2001 Apr;80(4):201-8. doi: 10.1007/s002770100289. Ann Hematol. 2001. PMID: 11401085
-
The impact of granulocyte colony stimulating factor at content of donor lymphocytes collected for cellular immunotherapy.Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Feb;30(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2003.05.004. Transfus Apher Sci. 2004. PMID: 14746816
-
Efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose G-CSF schedule for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in healthy donors.Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Dec;24(12):1273-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702073. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999. PMID: 10627634 Clinical Trial.
-
[Collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells from healthy donors].Acta Med Croatica. 2009 Jun;63(3):237-44. Acta Med Croatica. 2009. PMID: 19827352 Review. Croatian.
-
Collection of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells.Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 1999 Mar-Jun;12(1-2):41-55. doi: 10.1053/beha.1999.0006. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 1999. PMID: 11000982 Review.
Cited by
-
Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.Drugs. 2002;62 Suppl 1:1-15. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262001-00001. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 12479591 Review.
-
A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Jun;49(6):729-36. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.227. Epub 2014 Jan 27. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014. PMID: 24464144 Review.
-
Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization.Blood Rev. 2021 May;47:100771. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2020.100771. Epub 2020 Oct 31. Blood Rev. 2021. PMID: 33213986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stem cell collection in unmanipulated HLA-haploidentical/mismatched related transplantation with combined granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-mobilised blood and bone marrow for patients with haematologic malignancies: the impact of donor characteristics and procedural settings.Transfus Med. 2010 Jun;20(3):169-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2010.00990.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1. Transfus Med. 2010. PMID: 20136781 Free PMC article.
-
Change in erythropoietin pharmacokinetics following hematopoietic transplantation.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jun;81(6):873-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100165. Epub 2007 Apr 11. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007. PMID: 17429351 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical