The Tulipan-Bruner trocar for uterine entry during fetal surgery
- PMID: 10561643
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70106-7
The Tulipan-Bruner trocar for uterine entry during fetal surgery
Abstract
Objective: Our goal was to compare the use of a specially designed trocar for initial uterine entry with standard entry by electrocautery in creation of a hysterotomy for fetal surgery.
Study design: Ten consecutive patients undergoing hysterotomy for intrauterine repair of myelomeningocele were randomized to initial uterine entry with electrocautery or with the Tulipan-Bruner trocar. Timing of initial uterine entry with electrocautery began with incision into the uterine serosa and ended with incision of the chorioamnionic membranes. Timing of initial uterine entry with the Tulipan-Bruner trocar began with placement of stay sutures and ended with removal of the central introducer from the peel-away sheath. Blood loss was estimated by the primary surgeon. All of the participating surgeons judged the convenience and ease of each technique. The times required for initial uterine entry were compared with an unpaired t test. Statistical significance was set at P <.05.
Results: The time required for initial uterine entry with electrocautery was 231 +/- 63 (mean +/- SD) seconds compared with 146 +/- 51 seconds with the trocar (P <.05). The total blood loss for all 10 cases was <50 mL, but the presence of blood in the wound was judged much more inconvenient when electrocautery was used. Finally, electrocautery required 2 surgical assistants in every case, whereas the trocar was readily placed with only a single assistant.
Conclusion: The Tulipan-Bruner trocar provides quicker, less traumatic uterine entry during creation of a hysterotomy, as compared with electrocautery.
Similar articles
-
The Almodin-Moron trocar for uterine entry during fetal surgery.Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006;21(5):414-7. doi: 10.1159/000093882. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006. PMID: 16912489 Clinical Trial.
-
The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: obstetrical outcomes and risk factors for obstetrical complications following prenatal surgery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):778.e1-778.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.052. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27496687 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Reducing perinatal complications and preterm delivery for patients undergoing in utero closure of fetal myelomeningocele: further modifications to the multidisciplinary surgical technique.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Jul;14(1):108-14. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.PEDS13266. Epub 2014 May 2. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 24784979
-
Open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012 Mar;9(3):265-73. doi: 10.3171/2011.12.PEDS11403. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22380954 Review.
-
Intrauterine surgery in myelomeningocele.Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Dec;12(6):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Aug 22. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007. PMID: 17716961 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding Sociodemographic Disparities in Maternal-Fetal Surgery Study Participation.Fetal Diagn Ther. 2022;49(3):125-137. doi: 10.1159/000523867. Epub 2022 Mar 10. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2022. PMID: 35272297 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal versus postnatal repair procedures for spina bifida for improving infant and maternal outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 28;2014(10):CD008825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008825.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25348498 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources