The economic impact of capitated care for high utilizers of public mental health services: the Los Angeles PARTNERS program experience
- PMID: 10565102
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02287302
The economic impact of capitated care for high utilizers of public mental health services: the Los Angeles PARTNERS program experience
Abstract
Los Angeles PARTNERS, or "people achieving rehabilitation together need empowering respectful support," is a treatment program that uses capitation to shift risk for treatment costs of high utilizers of public mental health services to private community-based treatment organizations. This analysis reveals two important findings from PARTNERS. First, the economic incentives created by capitation contributed to the dis-enrollment of PARTNERS clients; furthermore, factors such as not speaking English or Spanish or having schizophrenia increased the probability of dis-enrollment. Second, analyses of health costs for enrollees in the PARTNERS capitation program suggest that the program did not result in a change in total costs. However, the program increased the use of community-based care and increased treatment costs for clients with lower preprogram costs but decreased costs for the clients with high preprogram costs. These results suggest that future capitation programs for this severely ill population would benefit from using detailed clinical information to determine program eligibility and to set risk-adjusted capitation rates.
Similar articles
-
Comment on "Managed care in the public sector: lessons learned from the Los Angeles PARTNERS program".J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 Nov;28(4):492. doi: 10.1007/BF02287779. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001. PMID: 11732251 No abstract available.
-
Variation in outpatient mental health service utilization under capitation.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):3-14. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005. PMID: 15870481
-
Risk adjustment for high utilizers of public mental health care.J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2000 Sep 1;3(3):129-137. doi: 10.1002/mhp.85. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2000. PMID: 11967448
-
Mental health services for Alzheimer's disease. Current trends in reimbursement and public policy, and the future under managed care.Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998 Spring;6(2 Suppl 1):S85-100. doi: 10.1097/00019442-199821001-00011. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998. PMID: 9581225 Review.
-
Strategies for integrating public mental health services.Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;42(8):797-801. doi: 10.1176/ps.42.8.797. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991. PMID: 1894253 Review.
Cited by
-
Tracking changes in behavioral health services: how have carve-outs changed care?J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999 Nov;26(4):360-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02287297. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999. PMID: 10565097 Review.
-
Defining frequent attendance in general practice.BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Apr 15;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-21. BMC Fam Pract. 2008. PMID: 18412954 Free PMC article.
-
Managed care in the public sector: lessons learned from the Los Angeles PARTNERS program.J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 May;28(2):155-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02287458. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001. PMID: 11338327
-
Association of Alternative Payment and Delivery Models With Outcomes for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e207401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7401. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32701157 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of individuals with severe mental illness who use emergency services.Community Ment Health J. 2005 Apr;41(2):159-68. doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-2650-0. Community Ment Health J. 2005. PMID: 15974496
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical