Within- and between-species DNA sequence variation and the 'footprint' of natural selection
- PMID: 10570982
- DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00294-2
Within- and between-species DNA sequence variation and the 'footprint' of natural selection
Abstract
Extensive DNA data emerging from genome-sequencing projects have revitalized interest in the mechanisms of molecular evolution. Although the contribution of natural selection at the molecular level has been debated for over 30 years, the relevant data and appropriate statistical methods to address this issue have only begun to emerge. This paper will first present the predominant models of neutral, nearly neutral, and adaptive molecular evolution. Then, a method to identify the role of natural selection in molecular evolution by comparing within- and between-species DNA sequence variation will be presented. Computer simulations show that such methods are powerful for detecting even very weak selection. Examination of DNA variation data within and between Drosophila species suggests that 'silent' sites evolve under a balance between weak selection and genetic drift. Simulated data also show that sequence comparisons are a powerful method to detect adaptive protein evolution, even when selection is weak or affects a small fraction of nucleotide sites. In the Drosophila data examined, positive selection appears to be a predominant force in protein evolution.
Similar articles
-
Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):49-60. Genetica. 1998. PMID: 9720271 Review.
-
Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):393-407. Genetica. 1998. PMID: 9720291
-
Pervasive natural selection in the Drosophila genome?PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000495. Epub 2009 Jun 5. PLoS Genet. 2009. PMID: 19503600 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting non-neutral heterogeneity across a region of DNA sequence in the ratio of polymorphism to divergence.Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Jan;13(1):253-60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025562. Mol Biol Evol. 1996. PMID: 8583898
-
Codon bias evolution in Drosophila. Population genetics of mutation-selection drift.Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):269-78. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00400-9. Gene. 1997. PMID: 9461401 Review.
Cited by
-
Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites.Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):431-49. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.1.431. Genetics. 2000. PMID: 10790415 Free PMC article.
-
Selection shapes malaria genomes and drives divergence between pathogens infecting hominids versus rodents.BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Jul 30;8:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-223. BMC Evol Biol. 2008. PMID: 18667061 Free PMC article.
-
Copy number variation and evolution in humans and chimpanzees.Genome Res. 2008 Nov;18(11):1698-710. doi: 10.1101/gr.082016.108. Epub 2008 Sep 4. Genome Res. 2008. PMID: 18775914 Free PMC article.
-
Intron size and exon evolution in Drosophila.Genetics. 2005 May;170(1):481-5. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.037333. Epub 2005 Mar 21. Genetics. 2005. PMID: 15781704 Free PMC article.
-
Melamine deaminase and atrazine chlorohydrolase: 98 percent identical but functionally different.J Bacteriol. 2001 Apr;183(8):2405-10. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2405-2410.2001. J Bacteriol. 2001. PMID: 11274097 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases