Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Nov;14(11):695-8.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11098.x.

Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders

K Armstrong  1 , M Berlin, J S Schwartz, K Propert, P A Ubel
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Educational content and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination reminders

K Armstrong et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if a mailed patient education brochure (addressing demonstrated reasons for vaccination refusal) would result in a higher rate of influenza vaccination than a mailed postcard reminder without educational content.

Design: Randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Urban, predominantly African-American, low-income community.

Participants: There were 740 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 years and older in the study.

Measurements: Receipt of influenza vaccination and beliefs about influenza and influenza vaccination were measured by telephone survey self-report.

Main results: We successfully contacted 202 individuals (69.9%) who received the postcard reminder and 229 individuals (71.1%) who received the educational brochure. People receiving the educational brochure were more likely to report influenza vaccination during the previous vaccination season than those who received the postcard reminder (66.4% vs 56.9%, p =.04). They also reported more interest in influenza vaccination in the coming year. (66.5% vs 57.1%, p =.05).

Conclusions: A mailed educational brochure is more effective than a simple reminder in increasing influenza vaccination rates among inner-city, elderly patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Subject selection and response. The circled letter “R” indicates randomly selected.
Appendix A
Appendix A
Educational Brochure
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control. Prevention and control of influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR. 1997;46 - PubMed
    1. Public Health Service . Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1991. pp. 121–3.
    1. Nichol KL, Margolis KL, Wuorenma J. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of vaccination against influenza among elderly persons living in the community. N Eng J Med. 1994;331:778–84. - PubMed
    1. Fedson DS, Wadja A, Nicol JP. Clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in Manitoba. JAMA. 1993;270:1956–61. - PubMed
    1. Foster DA, Talsma A, Furumoto-Dawson A, Ohmit SE, Margulies JR, Arden NH, Monto AS. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing hospitalization for pneumonia in the elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136:296–307. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances