Fertilization potential of spermatozoa with abnormal morphology
- PMID: 10573024
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_1.47
Fertilization potential of spermatozoa with abnormal morphology
Abstract
One of the best discriminators for the fertilization potential of human spermatozoa is sperm morphology. The problem in the assessment of the sperm morphological characteristics is their pleiomorphism. Examination of spermatozoa with the light microscope can provide only limited information on their internal structure. More detailed examination of sperm structure using electron microscopy can reveal major, often unsuspected ultrastructural abnormalities. Results and cut-off values for sperm analysis depend on the criteria for normal morphology. World Health Organization recommendations provide a classification suitable for clinical practice. Clinically reliable cut-off limits for normal sperm morphology according to strict Tygerberg criteria were suggested to be 4% in in-vitro fertilization procedures. Patients with severe sperm head abnormalities have a lower chance of establishing successful pregnancies, even though fertilization may be achieved. The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the standard semen parameters or to sperm morphology. Sperm decondensation defects and DNA anomalies may be underlying factors for the unrecognized derangements of the fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa, regardless of sperm morphology. Centrosome dysfunction may also represent a class of sperm defects that cannot be overcome simply by the insertion of a spermatozoon into the ooplasm. In this article an overview on the composition and ultrastructure of spermatozoa is presented, while emphasizing sperm ultrastructural and sperm DNA anomalies and their effects on fertilization.
Similar articles
-
Ultrastructural abnormalities of human spermatozoa.Hum Reprod. 1988 Apr;3(3):311-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136701. Hum Reprod. 1988. PMID: 3286678 Review.
-
Ultrastructure of gametes and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the significance of sperm morphology.Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13 Suppl 1:99-106. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_1.99. Hum Reprod. 1998. PMID: 9663774
-
An illustration of human sperm morphology and their functional ability among different group of subfertile males.Andrology. 2018 Sep;6(5):680-689. doi: 10.1111/andr.12500. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Andrology. 2018. PMID: 29959832
-
Incidence of abnormalities in sperm morphology as an indicator of its fertilizing potential.Indian J Med Res. 1992 Aug;96:215-8. Indian J Med Res. 1992. PMID: 1428058
-
Sperm morphology assessment: historical review in relation to fertility.Hum Reprod Update. 1995 Nov;1(6):543-57. doi: 10.1093/humupd/1.6.543. Hum Reprod Update. 1995. PMID: 9079395 Review.
Cited by
-
Abnormal pairing of X and Y sex chromosomes during meiosis I in interspecific hybrids of Phodopus campbelli and P. sungorus.Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 24;5:9435. doi: 10.1038/srep09435. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 25801302 Free PMC article.
-
Health risk and germ cell toxicity of five commercially available sachet waters in Nigeria: a public health concern.Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024 Jul 2;13(4):tfae101. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfae101. eCollection 2024 Aug. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2024. PMID: 38962114 Free PMC article.
-
Oral D-Aspartate Treatment Improves Sperm Fertility in Both Young and Adult B6N Mice.Animals (Basel). 2022 May 25;12(11):1350. doi: 10.3390/ani12111350. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35681815 Free PMC article.
-
Bisphenol A-induced Alterations in Different Stages of Spermatogenesis and Systemic Toxicity in Albino Mice (Mus musculus).J Health Pollut. 2021 Feb 25;11(29):210307. doi: 10.5696/2156-9614-11.29.210307. eCollection 2021 Mar. J Health Pollut. 2021. PMID: 33815905 Free PMC article.
-
The relevance of sperm morphology in male infertility.Front Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 3;4:945351. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.945351. eCollection 2022. Front Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 36303645 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources