Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review
- PMID: 10574231
- DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00244-0
Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review
Abstract
The aim of this review is to determine the frequency and circumstances under which predicting individuals' risk of illness has adverse psychological effects. Using systematic review methodology, the literature was searched for studies that had assessed the adverse psychological outcomes of risk assessment programmes. The outcomes investigated are emotional (anxiety, depression, distress) cognitive (intrusive thoughts, perceptions of health) and behaviour (work absenteeism). The impact of both positive and negative test results are summarised in terms of the number of studies showing significant effects between and within groups in the short (one month or less) and longer term (more than one month). Where sufficient data were available, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess effect size. Fifty-four studies met the criteria for inclusion. The studies assessed the impact of informing individuals about cardiovascular risk (21), risk of AIDS (eight), risk of cancer (10), risk of Huntington's disease (10), risk of diabetes (two), risk of spinocerebellar ataxia (one) and risk of osteoporosis (two). Overall, the quality of studies assessed was limited, with only two using a randomised design to determine the psychological impact of risk assessment. Receiving a positive test result was associated in the short term in the great majority of studies with depression, anxiety, poorer perceptions of health and psychological distress. Data were available for a quantitative synthesis of results on three outcomes, anxiety, depression and distress. Anxiety and depression were significantly higher in those tested positive compared with those tested negative in the short term but not the longer term. Distress could only be assessed in the longer term: there was no evidence of an increase for those receiving positive test results. The five experimental studies that reported interventions aimed at preventing some of these adverse effects all reported favourable results. There was little evidence of any adverse psychological effects of receiving an unfavourable test result. Adverse psychological effects are a common immediate consequence of positive test results following risk assessment. Results from the few experimental studies reviewed suggest that these adverse outcomes should not be seen as inevitable.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008. PMID: 21631819
-
Unhealthy behaviour modification, psychological distress, and 1-year survival in cardiac rehabilitation.Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;21(4):894-916. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12204. Br J Health Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27316556
-
Association between illness representation and psychological distress in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 8. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019. PMID: 30933872
-
Predicting general and cancer-related distress in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.BMC Cancer. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):935. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2964-z. BMC Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27914469 Free PMC article.
-
Twenty-five years of diabetes distress research.Diabet Med. 2020 Mar;37(3):393-400. doi: 10.1111/dme.14157. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Diabet Med. 2020. PMID: 31638279 Review.
Cited by
-
Testing positive for a genetic predisposition to depression magnifies retrospective memory for depressive symptoms.J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Nov;85(11):1052-1063. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000254. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017. PMID: 29083221 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A simple risk score using routine data for predicting cardiovascular disease in primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Aug;60(577):e327-34. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X515098. Br J Gen Pract. 2010. PMID: 20822683 Free PMC article.
-
Who attends a UK diabetes screening programme? Findings from the ADDITION-Cambridge study.Diabet Med. 2010 Sep;27(9):995-1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03056.x. Diabet Med. 2010. PMID: 20722672 Free PMC article.
-
Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.J Med Genet. 2004 Jul;41(7):e100. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.017541. J Med Genet. 2004. PMID: 15235043 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.J Genet Couns. 2005 Feb;14(1):55-69. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-1500-0. J Genet Couns. 2005. PMID: 15789156
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous