Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study
- PMID: 10574855
- PMCID: PMC28283
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1397
Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the incidences of caesarean sections in Latin American countries and correlate these with socioeconomic, demographic, and healthcare variables.
Design: Descriptive and ecological study.
Setting: 19 Latin American countries.
Main outcome measures: National estimates of caesarean section rates in each country.
Results: Seven countries had caesarean section rates below 15%. The remaining 12 countries had rates above 15% (range 16.8% to 40.0%). These 12 countries account for 81% of the deliveries in the region. A positive and significant correlation was observed between the gross national product per capita and rate of caesarean section (r(s)=0.746), and higher rates were observed in private hospitals than in public ones. Taking 15% as a medically justified accepted rate, over 850 000 unnecessary caesarean sections are performed each year in the region.
Conclusions: The reported figures represent an unnecessary increased risk for young women and their babies. From the economic perspective, this is a burden to health systems that work with limited budgets.
Figures
Comment in
-
Commentary: all women should have a choice.BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1401. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10610164 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: increase in cesarean sections may reflect medical control not women's choice.BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1401-2. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10610165 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: "health has become secondary to a sexually attractive body".BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1402. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10610166
-
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1072-3; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10764376 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. A debate is needed on caesarean section rates in India.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836803 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Brazilian obstetricians are pressured to perform caesarean sections.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836804 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Women choose caesarean section.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836805 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Elective caesarean can increase the risk to the fetus.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073-4. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836806 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Further research is needed on why rates of caesarean section are increasing.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836807 No abstract available.
References
-
- Shearer E. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37:1223–1231. - PubMed
-
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Cesarean childbirth. Report of a consensus Development Conference. Bethesda, MD: NIH; 1981.
-
- Wolfe S. Unnecessary cesarean sections: curing a national epidemic. Public Citizen Health Research Group. 1994;10:1–7.
-
- What is the right number of caesarean sections? Lancet. 1997;349:815. - PubMed
-
- Faúndes A, Cecatti JG. Which policy for caesarean sections in Brazil? An analysis of trends and consequences. Health Policy Plan. 1993;8:33–42.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical