Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1397-400.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1397.

Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study

Affiliations

Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study

J M Belizán et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the incidences of caesarean sections in Latin American countries and correlate these with socioeconomic, demographic, and healthcare variables.

Design: Descriptive and ecological study.

Setting: 19 Latin American countries.

Main outcome measures: National estimates of caesarean section rates in each country.

Results: Seven countries had caesarean section rates below 15%. The remaining 12 countries had rates above 15% (range 16.8% to 40.0%). These 12 countries account for 81% of the deliveries in the region. A positive and significant correlation was observed between the gross national product per capita and rate of caesarean section (r(s)=0.746), and higher rates were observed in private hospitals than in public ones. Taking 15% as a medically justified accepted rate, over 850 000 unnecessary caesarean sections are performed each year in the region.

Conclusions: The reported figures represent an unnecessary increased risk for young women and their babies. From the economic perspective, this is a burden to health systems that work with limited budgets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Correlation between the gross national product per capita (£) and caesarean section rates in 18 Latin American countries (rs=0.746)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shearer E. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37:1223–1231. - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Cesarean childbirth. Report of a consensus Development Conference. Bethesda, MD: NIH; 1981.
    1. Wolfe S. Unnecessary cesarean sections: curing a national epidemic. Public Citizen Health Research Group. 1994;10:1–7.
    1. What is the right number of caesarean sections? Lancet. 1997;349:815. - PubMed
    1. Faúndes A, Cecatti JG. Which policy for caesarean sections in Brazil? An analysis of trends and consequences. Health Policy Plan. 1993;8:33–42.

Publication types