Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study
- PMID: 10574855
- PMCID: PMC28283
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1397
Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the incidences of caesarean sections in Latin American countries and correlate these with socioeconomic, demographic, and healthcare variables.
Design: Descriptive and ecological study.
Setting: 19 Latin American countries.
Main outcome measures: National estimates of caesarean section rates in each country.
Results: Seven countries had caesarean section rates below 15%. The remaining 12 countries had rates above 15% (range 16.8% to 40.0%). These 12 countries account for 81% of the deliveries in the region. A positive and significant correlation was observed between the gross national product per capita and rate of caesarean section (r(s)=0.746), and higher rates were observed in private hospitals than in public ones. Taking 15% as a medically justified accepted rate, over 850 000 unnecessary caesarean sections are performed each year in the region.
Conclusions: The reported figures represent an unnecessary increased risk for young women and their babies. From the economic perspective, this is a burden to health systems that work with limited budgets.
Figures
Comment in
-
Commentary: all women should have a choice.BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1401. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10610164 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: increase in cesarean sections may reflect medical control not women's choice.BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1401-2. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10610165 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: "health has become secondary to a sexually attractive body".BMJ. 1999 Nov 27;319(7222):1402. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10610166
-
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1072-3; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10764376 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. A debate is needed on caesarean section rates in India.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836803 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Brazilian obstetricians are pressured to perform caesarean sections.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836804 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Women choose caesarean section.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073; author reply 1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836805 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Elective caesarean can increase the risk to the fetus.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073-4. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836806 No abstract available.
-
Caesarean section controversy. Further research is needed on why rates of caesarean section are increasing.BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1074. BMJ. 2000. PMID: 10836807 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Caesarean section rates in the Arab region: a cross-national study.Health Policy Plan. 2004 Mar;19(2):101-10. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh012. Health Policy Plan. 2004. PMID: 14982888 Free PMC article.
-
Are there national risk factors for epidemic cholera? The correlation between socioeconomic and demographic indices and cholera incidence in Latin America.Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;27(2):330-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.2.330. Int J Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 9602419
-
Stillbirth rates in 20 countries of Latin America: an ecological study.BJOG. 2018 Sep;125(10):1263-1270. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15294. Epub 2018 Jun 29. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 29797404
-
An approach to identify a minimum and rational proportion of caesarean sections in resource-poor settings: a global network study.Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Aug;6(8):e894-e901. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30241-9. Lancet Glob Health. 2018. PMID: 30012270 Free PMC article. Review.
-
WHO Recommendations Non-Clinical Interventions to Reduce Unnecessary Caesarean Sections.Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. PMID: 30398818 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?CMAJ. 2007 Feb 13;176(4):475-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061724. CMAJ. 2007. PMID: 17296960 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Birth after caesarean study--planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomised trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Aug 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-17. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007. PMID: 17697343 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme increases cesarean section rates among the rural poor.Eur J Public Health. 2010 Aug;20(4):383-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp184. Epub 2009 Nov 23. Eur J Public Health. 2010. PMID: 19933778 Free PMC article.
-
Mode of childbirth in low-risk pregnancies: Nicaraguan physicians' viewpoints.Matern Child Health J. 2014 Dec;18(10):2382-92. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1478-z. Matern Child Health J. 2014. PMID: 24740720
-
Caesarean section--an appraisal of some predictive factors in Lagos Nigeria.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jun 30;14:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-217. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 24981086 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shearer E. Cesarean section: medical benefits and costs. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37:1223–1231. - PubMed
-
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Cesarean childbirth. Report of a consensus Development Conference. Bethesda, MD: NIH; 1981.
-
- Wolfe S. Unnecessary cesarean sections: curing a national epidemic. Public Citizen Health Research Group. 1994;10:1–7.
-
- What is the right number of caesarean sections? Lancet. 1997;349:815. - PubMed
-
- Faúndes A, Cecatti JG. Which policy for caesarean sections in Brazil? An analysis of trends and consequences. Health Policy Plan. 1993;8:33–42.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical