Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Dec 4;319(7223):1472-5.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1472.

Does hospital at home for palliative care facilitate death at home? Randomised controlled trial

G E Grande  1 , C J Todd, S I Barclay, M C Farquhar
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Does hospital at home for palliative care facilitate death at home? Randomised controlled trial

G E Grande et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact on place of death of a hospital at home service for palliative care.

Design: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Former Cambridge health district.

Participants: 229 patients referred to the hospital at home service; 43 randomised to control group (standard care), 186 randomised to hospital at home.

Intervention: Hospital at home versus standard care.

Main outcome measures: Place of death.

Results: Twenty five (58%) control patients died at home compared with 124 (67%) patients allocated to hospital at home. This difference was not significant; intention to treat analysis did not show that hospital at home increased the number of deaths at home. Seventy three patients randomised to hospital at home were not admitted to the service. Patients admitted to hospital at home were significantly more likely to die at home (88/113; 78%) than control patients. It is not possible to determine whether this was due to hospital at home itself or other characteristics of the patients admitted to the service. The study attained less statistical power than initially planned.

Conclusion: In a locality with good provision of standard community care we could not show that hospital at home allowed more patients to die at home, although neither does the study refute this. Problems relating to recruitment, attrition, and the vulnerability of the patient group make randomised controlled trials in palliative care difficult. While these difficulties have to be recognised they are not insurmountable with the appropriate resourcing and setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Distribution of patients entering randomised controlled trial of hospital at home versus standard care for terminally ill patients
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Office for National Statistics. Mortality statistics, general. Review of registrar general on deaths in England and Wales, 1993-1995. London: Stationery Office; 1997.
    1. Dunlop RJ, Davies RJ, Hockley JM. Preferred versus actual place of death: a hospital palliative care support team experience. Palliat Med. 1989;3:197–201.
    1. Townsend J, Frank AO, Fermont D, Dyer S, Karran O, Walgrove A, et al. Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study. BMJ. 1990;301:415–417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinton J. Which patients with terminal cancer are admitted from home care? Palliat Med. 1994;8:197–210. - PubMed
    1. Charlton RC. Attitudes towards care of the dying: a questionnaire survey of general practice attenders. Fam Pract. 1991;8:356–359. - PubMed

Publication types