Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Nov;29(11):905-12.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1999.00563.x.

Left atrial systolic function is depressed in idiopathic and preserved in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Affiliations

Left atrial systolic function is depressed in idiopathic and preserved in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

F Triposkiadis et al. Eur J Clin Invest. 1999 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Left atrial systolic dysfunction, unexplained by altered loading conditions, has been reported in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy suggesting left atrial involvement in the myopathic process.

Materials and methods: Seventeen patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 16 with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and 18 normal controls were studied with transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Transmitral diastolic flow was evaluated with pulsed Doppler. Left atrial volume (cm3/m2) at mitral valve opening (maximal, Vmax.), onset of atrial systole (P wave of the electrocardiogram, Vp), and mitral valve closure (minimal, Vmin. ) was determined with two-dimensional echocardiography using the biplane area-length method. The left atrial active emptying fraction (ACTEF = [Vp-Vmin.] x 100/Vp) served as an index of systolic function.

Results: The peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity (cm/sec) was similar in the three groups (idiopathic: 60 +/- 16, ischemic: 58 +/- 20, control: 56 +/- 22; P = NS), whereas the late diastolic transmitral flow velocity was lower but not significantly different in idiopathic compared to ischemic cardiomyopathy, and in both was lower than control (26 +/- 12 vs. 34 +/- 13 vs. 44 +/- 14, respectively; P < 0.05). Vmax. and Vp were similar in idiopathic and ischemic cardiomyopathy and greater than control (44.6 +/- 13.6 vs. 48.2 +/- 18.3 vs. 26.9 +/- 6.2; P < 0.05, and 34.6 +/- 13.4 vs. 30.8 +/- 10.9 vs. 16.7 +/- 3.7, respectively; P < 0.05). ACTEF was lower in idiopathic than in ischemic cardiomyopathy and in the latter it was similar to control (18 +/- 10% vs. 32 +/- 10% vs. 36 +/- 10%, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreover, ACTEF was inversely related to left atrial tension at end-of atrial systole both in idiopathic and in ischemic cardiomyopathy (r2 = 0.52, P = 0.001 and r2 = 0.57, P = 0.0007, respectively). However, at any given level of left atrial tension at end of atrial systole, ACTEF was lower in idiopathic than ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Conclusion: Left atrial systolic function is depressed in idiopathic and preserved in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy despite similar left atrial loading conditions. This finding suggests left atrial myopathy in the former, and may be related to the differences in the response to medical treatment and clinical outcome observed between the two conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources