Meta-style and expert review
- PMID: 10584713
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00355-4
Meta-style and expert review
Comment on
-
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.Lancet. 1999 Nov 27;354(9193):1896-900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5. Lancet. 1999. PMID: 10584742 Review.
Similar articles
-
Practice guidelines and practical judgement: the role of mega-trials, meta-analysis and consensus.Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jul;44(384):290-1. Br J Gen Pract. 1994. PMID: 8068372 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Expert opinions--consensus documents--systematic overviews--is the value for clinicians increasing?Acta Oncol. 2005;44(3):201-2. doi: 10.1080/02841860510029842. Acta Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16076690 No abstract available.
-
[Outcomes in randomized trials: Typology, relevance and importance for their standardization. Example of renoprotection].Presse Med. 2015 Nov;44(11):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Presse Med. 2015. PMID: 26454307 French. No abstract available.
-
A meta-analysis of meta-analyses.Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):11-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.029. Fertil Steril. 2011. PMID: 21723440 Review.
-
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98. Health Technol Assess. 1999. PMID: 10374081 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Hepatitis B vaccination for patients with chronic renal failure.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(3):CD003775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003775.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 15266500 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials - a systematic survey.BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2001;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-1-3. Epub 2001 Sep 12. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2001. PMID: 11591227 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources