Single-agent paclitaxel and paclitaxel/non-platinum combination therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
- PMID: 10585009
Single-agent paclitaxel and paclitaxel/non-platinum combination therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract
Cumulative experience with single-agent paclitaxel in advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suggests that it is a highly active cytotoxic agent. The consistent finding of a 35% to 40% 1-year survival rate is notable. The major toxicities include neutropenia, neuropathy, and myalgia/arthralgia syndrome. Paclitaxel has been used in combination with several other nonplatinum agents for the treatment of NSCLC. Order of administration and schedule are clearly relevant in these combinations. For example, in one study, etoposide and paclitaxel given simultaneously proved ineffective, with substantial grade IV neutropenia Another schedule with an identical dose of etoposide, given daily for 3 days, followed by paclitaxel achieved a response rate of 41%, with markedly diminished neutropenia A variety of phase I studies have evaluated gemcitabine/paclitaxel, with response rates ranging from 22% to 30%. Paclitaxel/vinorelbine also has proven feasible in both small cell lung cancer and NSCLC, with a response rate of 17%. Investigators have combined paclitaxel with ifosfamide at full dose with response rates of 21% and 23%. The three-drug nonplatinum combination of paclitaxel/ifosfamide/vinorelbine also has been studied. The maximum tolerated dose for ifosfamide was 1.2 g/m2 on days 1 through 3, for vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3, and for paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1. The response rate of 16% was disappointing. Median survival was 6.1 months and toxicity was substantial. Paclitaxel/non-platinum combinations may prove to be reasonable alternatives for NSCLC patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin and for relapsed patients and patients with compromised performance status.
Similar articles
-
A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Ann Oncol. 1998 Jun;9(6):677-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1008217613774. Ann Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9681085 Clinical Trial.
-
Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer after prior treatment with taxane+platinum-based regimens.Eur J Cancer. 2001 May;37(8):972-8. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00419-6. Eur J Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11334721 Clinical Trial.
-
Challenging the platinum combinations: docetaxel (Taxotere) combined with gemcitabine or vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 2001 Feb;28(1 Suppl 2):15-21. doi: 10.1016/s0093-7754(01)90299-4. Semin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11284620 Review.
-
Vinorelbine plus gemcitabine followed by docetaxel versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase III study.Lancet Oncol. 2008 Dec;9(12):1135-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70261-4. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Lancet Oncol. 2008. PMID: 19013107 Clinical Trial.
-
Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: have we reached a new plateau?Semin Oncol. 1999 Feb;26(1 Suppl 4):3-11. Semin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10201515 Review.
Cited by
-
Animal models of cancer pain.Comp Med. 2008 Jun;58(3):220-33. Comp Med. 2008. PMID: 18589864 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Platinum drugs in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.Br J Cancer. 2002 Oct 7;87(8):825-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600540. Br J Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12373594 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Paclitaxel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer.Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1111-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001. PMID: 11735678 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical