Similar articles

• [Availability and improvement of a vacuum-type immobilization device in pediatric CT].

  Tani S, Mizuno N, Abe S. Tani S, et al. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2002 Aug;58(8):1073-9. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.kj00003111440. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2002. PMID: 12514559 Japanese.
• Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization.

  Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stockhoff C. Johnson DR, et al. Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;14(4):369-72. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90051-0. Am J Emerg Med. 1996. PMID: 8768157 Clinical Trial.
• [Assessment of patient movement in interventional procedures using electromagnetic detection - comparison between conventional fixation and vacuum mattress].

  Mallmann C, Wolf KJ, Wacker FK, Meyer BC. Mallmann C, et al. Rofo. 2012 Jan;184(1):37-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281633. Epub 2011 Dec 9. Rofo. 2012. PMID: 22161235 German.
• New possibilities of diagnostic imaging and intervention.

  Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Curr Probl Cancer. 2003 Jan-Feb;27(1):32-8. doi: 10.1067/mcn.2003.5. Curr Probl Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12569348 Review. No abstract available.
• Imaging of soft tissue and osseous sarcomas of the extremities.

  Colleran G, Madewell J, Foran P, Shelly M, O'Sullivan PJ. Colleran G, et al. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011 Oct;32(5):442-55. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.05.001. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011. PMID: 21963165 Review.