Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: odor detection, discrimination and odor memory
- PMID: 10587496
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/24.6.637
Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: odor detection, discrimination and odor memory
Abstract
Mice were trained on a variety of odor detection and discrimination tasks in 100- or 200-trial sessions using a go, no-go discrete trials operant conditioning procedure. Odors, presented for 1 s on each trial, were generated by an air dilution olfactometer (for threshold tests) and an easily constructed eight-channel liquid dilution unit (for two- and multiple-odor discrimination tasks). Mice rapidly acquired the operant task and demonstrated excellent stimulus control by odor vapors. Their absolute detection threshold for ethyl acetate was similar to that obtained with rats using similar methods. They readily acquired four separate two-odor discrimination tasks and continued to perform well when all eight odors were presented in random order in the same session and when reinforcement probability for correct responding was decreased from 1 to 0.5. Memory for these eight odors, assessed under extinction after a 32 day rest period, was essentially perfect. Time spent sampling the odor on S+ and S- trials was highly correlated with response accuracy. When accuracy was at chance levels (e.g. initial trials on a novel task), stimulus sampling time on both S+ and S- trials was approximately 0.5-0.7 s. As response accuracy increased, sampling time on S+ trials tended to increase and remain higher than sampling time on S- trials.
Similar articles
-
Olfactometry with mice.Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2005 Nov;Chapter 8:Unit 8.20. doi: 10.1002/0471142301.ns0820s33. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 18428626
-
Odor-sampling time of mice under different conditions.Chem Senses. 2007 Jun;32(5):445-54. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjm013. Epub 2007 Apr 9. Chem Senses. 2007. PMID: 17426048
-
An odor detection system based on automatically trained mice by relative go no-go olfactory operant conditioning.Sci Rep. 2015 May 6;5:10019. doi: 10.1038/srep10019. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 25944031 Free PMC article.
-
Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.Neuron. 2004 Dec 2;44(5):865-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.017. Neuron. 2004. PMID: 15572116
-
Determination of odor detection threshold in the Gottingen minipig.Chem Senses. 2010 Oct;35(8):727-34. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq076. Epub 2010 Aug 6. Chem Senses. 2010. PMID: 20693277 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Tonic inhibition sets the state of excitability in olfactory bulb granule cells.J Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;591(7):1841-50. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.241851. Epub 2013 Jan 14. J Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23318869 Free PMC article.
-
Procedures for behavioral experiments in head-fixed mice.PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088678. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24520413 Free PMC article.
-
Closed-Loop Optogenetic Stimulation of the Olfactory Circuit at Different Phases of Theta Oscillations of the Local Field Potential.Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2915:179-187. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4466-9_12. Methods Mol Biol. 2025. PMID: 40249492
-
Olfactory dysfunction and altered cortical excitability in the mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.Biol Res. 2025 Apr 24;58(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40659-024-00582-2. Biol Res. 2025. PMID: 40275427 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced urinary odor discrimination in female aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice.Horm Behav. 2006 May;49(5):580-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.12.013. Epub 2006 Jan 30. Horm Behav. 2006. PMID: 16448653 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials