The AFFIRM trial: main trial and substudies-what can We expect?
- PMID: 10590505
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1009815606734
The AFFIRM trial: main trial and substudies-what can We expect?
Abstract
The clinical categorization of patients who present with atrial fibrillation is a major determinant of the most appropriate strategy for rhythm management. For those patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation that has not become permanent the two available strategies are rhythm control and anticoagulation or rate control and anticoagulation. There is no clear evidence that one of these strategies is superior to the other. In the AFFIRM trial these two strategies are being compared to one another in a randomized trial. Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two strategies and the treating physician then uses therapies from an approved menu as clinically indicated. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies are used. An overview of the main study protocol is presented. The primary endpoint is total mortality but there are a number of clinically important secondary endpoints. Several substudies will explore important ancillary questions and some of these are also described. At this time over 3000 patients have been enrolled and the planned enrollment is 4300. Enrollment will end late in 1999 and the last patient enrolled will be followed for two years. The AFFIRM Trial will provide important information concerning the management of atrial fibrillation in a large portion of the patients who have this arrhythmia.
Similar articles
-
Atrial fibrillation: rate control versus maintenance of sinus rhythm.Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001 Jan;16(1):46-53. doi: 10.1097/00001573-200101000-00007. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001. PMID: 11124718 Review.
-
AFFIRM and RACE trials: implications for the management of atrial fibrillation.Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec;7(4):366-9. doi: 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023140.38226.75. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003. PMID: 15071255 Review.
-
Outcomes of apixaban vs. warfarin by type and duration of atrial fibrillation: results from the ARISTOTLE trial.Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(31):2464-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht135. Epub 2013 Apr 17. Eur Heart J. 2013. PMID: 23594592 Clinical Trial.
-
Rate vs rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.Arch Intern Med. 2005 Feb 14;165(3):258-62. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.3.258. Arch Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15710787 Review.
-
Rate versus rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: what the trials really say.Drugs. 2005;65(12):1651-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565120-00004. Drugs. 2005. PMID: 16060699 Review.
Cited by
-
New insights into the mechanisms and management of atrial fibrillation.CMAJ. 2002 Oct 29;167(9):1012-20. CMAJ. 2002. PMID: 12403742 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Randomized trials of rate vs. rhythm control for atrial fibrillation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004;10 Suppl 1:45-53. doi: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000011345.38643.ab. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004. PMID: 14739739 Review.
-
Current management of symptomatic atrial fibrillation.Drugs. 2001;61(10):1425-37. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161100-00006. Drugs. 2001. PMID: 11558832 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical