The Ottawa Ankle Rules in Asia: validating a clinical decision rule for requesting X-rays in twisting ankle and foot injuries
- PMID: 10595876
- DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00120-1
The Ottawa Ankle Rules in Asia: validating a clinical decision rule for requesting X-rays in twisting ankle and foot injuries
Abstract
This was a study to determine if the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) for requesting x-ray studies in twisting ankle and foot injuries are applicable in our Asian population. Four hundred ninety-four consecutive eligible patients presenting to the emergency department with twisting injuries about the ankle were examined by emergency physicians for clinical criteria requiring ankle and foot x-ray studies according to the OAR. Four hundred eighty-eight of these patients underwent x-ray studies that were interpreted by a radiologist. The sensitivity and specificity of the OAR for predicting the presence of fracture were calculated to be 0.9 and 0.34, respectively. When the rules were modified to cast a wider screening net, sensitivity improved to 0.99. We conclude that the OAR are not applicable to our population because of inadequate sensitivity, but when modified become acceptable and can reduce the number of x-ray studies requested by 28%.
Similar articles
-
Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a Danish emergency department.Dan Med Bull. 2010 May;57(5):A4142. Dan Med Bull. 2010. PMID: 20441713
-
Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules for midfoot and ankle injuries.Acta Biomed. 2021 Sep 2;92(4):e2021241. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i4.9962. Acta Biomed. 2021. PMID: 34487104 Free PMC article.
-
Minimising negative ankle and foot X-rays in the Emergency Department -- are the Ottawa ankle rules good enough?Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):2002-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Injury. 2014. PMID: 25257400 Review.
-
Accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle Rules applied by non-physician providers in a pediatric emergency department.CJEM. 2018 Sep;20(5):746-752. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.399. Epub 2017 Oct 2. CJEM. 2018. PMID: 28965519
-
Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis.Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;16(4):277-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00333.x. Epub 2009 Feb 2. Acad Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 19187397
Cited by
-
Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Iran: a prospective survey.BMC Emerg Med. 2006 Feb 16;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-6-3. BMC Emerg Med. 2006. PMID: 16480520 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12595378 Free PMC article.
-
[The Ottawa ankle guidelines: analysis of their validity as clinical decision guidelines in the indication of X-rays for ankle and/or middle-foot injuries].Aten Primaria. 2001 Jun 30;28(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78913-5. Aten Primaria. 2001. PMID: 11440651 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.CMAJ. 2002 Mar 19;166(6):727-33. CMAJ. 2002. PMID: 11944759 Free PMC article.
-
Ottawa ankle and foot rules in China: applicability in a defensive environment.Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jul 30;30(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02961-1. Eur J Med Res. 2025. PMID: 40739246 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous