Sterilization and its consequences
- PMID: 10596397
- DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199912000-00005
Sterilization and its consequences
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to analyze critically the two techniques of sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation [BTL] and vasectomy) so that a physician may provide informed consent about methods of sterilization. A MEDLINE search and extensive review of published literature dating back to 1966 was undertaken to compare preoperative counseling, operative procedures, postoperative complications, procedure-related costs, psychosocial consequences, and feasibility of reversal between BTL and a vasectomy. Compared with a vasectomy, BTL is 20 times more likely to have major complications, 10 to 37 times more likely to fail, and cost three times as much. Moreover, the procedure-related mortality, although rare, is 12 times higher with sterilization of the woman than of the man. Despite these advantages, 300,000 more BTLs were done in 1987 than vasectomies. In 1987, there were 976,000 sterilizations (65 percent BTLs and 35 percent vasectomies) with an overall cost of $1.8 billion. Over $260 million could have been saved if equal numbers of vasectomies and BTLs had been performed, or more than $800 million if 80 percent had been vasectomies, as was the case in 1971. The safest, most efficacious, and least expensive method of sterilization is vasectomy. For these reasons, physicians should recommend vasectomy when providing counseling on sterilization, despite the popularity of BTL.
Target audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians
Learning objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to predict the failure rates and likelihood of successful reversal of tubal ligation and vasectomy; to recall the difference in cost between the two sterilization procedures, and to describe the short-term and long-term complications associated with each of the two methods of sterilization.
Similar articles
-
The provision of sterilization services by private physicians.Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 Sep-Oct;17(5):216-20. Fam Plann Perspect. 1985. PMID: 3916183
-
Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed.Fertil Steril. 1984 Mar;41(3):337-55. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47709-5. Fertil Steril. 1984. PMID: 6230257
-
Bringing men to the table: sterilization can be for him or for her.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):731-40. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000060. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25314085 Review.
-
Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal.Br J Urol. 1994 Apr;73(4):337-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07592.x. Br J Urol. 1994. PMID: 8199817 Review.
-
Physician attitudes and practices studied in Sao Paulo, Brazil.Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1985 Spring;6(3):4-5. Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1985. PMID: 12280132
Cited by
-
Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Oct 1;13(21):1-35. eCollection 2013. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013. PMID: 24228084 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence of social media on patient and public perception of vasectomy: a narrative review.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01114-6. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 40562868 Review.
-
[Vasectomy : Current information].Urologe A. 2021 Apr;60(4):523-532. doi: 10.1007/s00120-021-01494-9. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Urologe A. 2021. PMID: 33738559 German.
-
Barriers to Offering Vasectomy at Publicly Funded Family Planning Organizations in Texas.Am J Mens Health. 2017 May;11(3):757-766. doi: 10.1177/1557988317694296. Epub 2017 Feb 1. Am J Mens Health. 2017. PMID: 28413942 Free PMC article.
-
Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns' experiences.Contraception. 2014 Oct;90(4):422-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 4. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24912729 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical