Participants' perceptions of dimensions of the therapeutic alliance over the course of therapy
- PMID: 10608908
- PMCID: PMC3330579
Participants' perceptions of dimensions of the therapeutic alliance over the course of therapy
Abstract
The course of diverse dimensions of the therapeutic alliance as seen by the therapy participants was examined in two studies. In Study 1, use of the Penn Helping Alliance Method, Therapeutic Alliance Rating System, and Vanderbilt Psychotherapy Process Scale at the 3rd, 10th, and next-to-last therapy sessions revealed significant increases over time for therapists' mean scores on 5 of the 12 subscales. Consistency of participants' scores over time varied depending on rater perspective (therapist or client) and time interval. In Study 2, the Helping Alliance Questionnaire, Working Alliance Inventory, and California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales showed no significant change in participants' average alliance scores on the 9 subscales from the 5th to 10th sessions, and their same-scale ratings were in general consistent. Few differences were observed between therapists' and clients' average alliance ratings, but the relationship was generally perceived differently within dyads.
References
-
- Bordin E: The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 1979; 16:252–260
-
- Horvath AO, Greenberg L: Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1989; 36:223–233
-
- Horvath AO, Greenberg LS: Introduction, in The Working Alliance: Theory, Research and Practice, edited by Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. New York, Wiley, 1994, pp 1–9
-
- Stiles W, Shapiro D, Elliott R: Are all psychotherapies equivalent? Am Psychol 1986; 41:165–180 - PubMed
-
- Horvath AO, Symonds BD: Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1991; 38:139–149
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources