Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Dec 21;96(26):14931-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.14931.

The 65-kDa carrot microtubule-associated protein forms regularly arranged filamentous cross-bridges between microtubules

Affiliations

The 65-kDa carrot microtubule-associated protein forms regularly arranged filamentous cross-bridges between microtubules

J Chan et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

In plants, cortical microtubules (MTs) occur in characteristically parallel groups maintained up to one microtubule diameter apart by fine filamentous cross-bridges. However, none of the plant microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) so far purified accounts for the observed separation between MTs in cells. We previously isolated from carrot cytoskeletons a MAP fraction including 120- and 65-kDa MAPs and have now separated the 65-kDa carrot MAP by sucrose density centrifugation. MAP65 does not induce tubulin polymerization but induces the formation of bundles of parallel MTs in a nucleotide-insensitive manner. The bundling effect is inhibited by porcine MAP2, but, unlike MAP2, MAP65 is heat-labile. In the electron microscope, MAP65 appears as filamentous cross-bridges, maintaining an intermicrotubule spacing of 25-30 nm. Microdensitometer-computer correlation analysis reveals that the cross-bridges are regularly spaced, showing a regular axial spacing that is compatible with a symmetrical helical superlattice for 13 protofilament MTs. Because MAP65 maintains in vitro the inter-MT spacing observed in plants and is shown to decorate cortical MTs, it is proposed that this MAP is important for the organization of the cortical array in vivo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Purification of MAP65. The carrot MAP fraction was purified by sucrose density centrifugation. The silver-stained gel of the fractions (–5) shows separation of MAP65 from MAP120. Vertical axis, molecular weight markers; horizontal axis, key fractions. (Inset) Pooled MAP65 fraction showing the predominant 62-kDa member of the MAP65 triplet; MAP68 is shown as the thin band above.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MAP65 bundles microtubules. (A) Rhodamine-conjugated, taxol-stabilized MTs bundled by MAP65. (B) Negatively stained EM sample showing parallel, bundled MTs. (C and D) Control MTs without MAP65. [Bar = 36 μm (fluorescent images) and 500 nm (EM).]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Concentration effects of MAP65 on MT bundling. Increasing concentrations of MAP65 from 0 to 2 μM stimulate increased MT bundling (measured as percentage of single MTs relative to the MAP-free MT control).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A and B) MTs bundled by MAP65. Inter-MT bridges appear as filaments projecting between walls of the MTs cut in longitudinal section. (C) Frequency histogram of the lengths of inter-MT bridges, which peak at 25–30 nm (n = 197). (D) MTs cut in transverse section, with filamentous bridges joining them. (E) The area between the upper two MTs was scanned to produce the autocorrelogram in F; a single axial repeat of 35.7 nm is evident. (G) The area between the upper two MTs was scanned to produce the autocorrelogram shown in H; peaks correspond to the spacings predicted by the 12-dimer superlattice model, which are indicated by dots. The lattice repeat distance is represented by strong peaks at 96 and 192 nm (asterisks). [Bar = 130 nm (A, B, D, E and G).]
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cortical MTs exposed on substrate-attached disks of plasma membrane from carrot protoplasts. Anti-MAP65 antibodies immunofluorescently stain the MTs in a punctate fashion (A), in contrast to the continuous pattern obtained with anti-tubulin (B). (Bar = 16 μm.)

References

    1. Hardham A R, Gunning B E S. J Cell Biol. 1978;77:14–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seagull R W, Heath I B. Protoplasma. 1980;103:205–229.
    1. Akashi T, Shibaoka H. Plant Cell Physiol. 1987;28:339–348.
    1. Duckett C M, Lloyd C W. Plant J. 1994;5:363–372.
    1. Lloyd C W. Mol Biol Cell. 1994;5:1277–1280. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources