A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- PMID: 10613279
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01713.x
A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Abstract
Background: Although the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed as day surgery has been established, cost and recovery time have not previously been evaluated in a prospective comparative fashion.
Methods: Patients were randomized to day stay only or overnight stay, and a nurse assessed the former postoperatively at home. All patients were reviewed weekly or as required if problems occurred. Costing comparisons were made between the two groups using Trendstar software.
Results: A total of 131 patients were evaluated after randomization (60 day-stay only patients and 71 overnight-stay patients). A total of 18.3% of the day-stay patients required in-hospital admission for nausea, vomiting, or pain, or after conversion to open operation; 18.3% of the overnight group required an extended length of stay for similar reasons. After discharge, two day-stay and three overnight-stay patients required readmission, only one had a significant complication. The mean times to return to normal activity averaged 1.8 weeks (SE: 0.1 weeks) and 1.9 weeks (SE: 0.1 weeks) for day-stay and overnight-stay groups, respectively (P = 0.63), and costs of $2732 (SE: $76) compared to $2835 (SE $110), respectively (P = 0.94).
Conclusions: In the present randomized controlled study, day-stay management did not compromise postoperative patient outcome. In the setting of a major teaching hospital there was no cost advantage when compared to overnight-stay management.
Comment in
-
A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comment.Aust N Z J Surg. 2000 Oct;70(10):743. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01943.x. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000. PMID: 11021490 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources