Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Dec;230(6):750-7; discussion 757-8.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199912000-00003.

Ileoneorectal anastomosis: early clinical results of a restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis without formation of an ileoanal pouch

Affiliations

Ileoneorectal anastomosis: early clinical results of a restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis without formation of an ileoanal pouch

C J van Laarhoven et al. Ann Surg. 1999 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a new surgical procedure, ileoneorectal anastomosis (INRA), in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

Summary background data: Surgical treatment in UC and FAP aims to resect diseased colonic mucosa and restore oroanal continuity. The ileopouch anal anastomosis achieves this but has a 15% to 35% complication rate, a 10% failure rate, and an unpredictable functional outcome. An alternative surgical technique, INRA, has been developed in which the rectal mucosa is replaced by a vascularized ileal mucosa graft.

Methods: Eleven patients underwent an INRA procedure with a temporary diverting ileostomy. Clinical history, repeat endoscopy, histologic examination, and rectal compliance measurements were carried out before and after surgery.

Results: The INRA procedure was technically successful in all patients. Endoscopy showed ingrowth of ileal mucosa in the neorectum, with 100% coverage after 6 weeks. No patient had pelvic sepsis, neorectal-anal or -vaginal fistula, autonomic nerve damage, or fecal incontinence. Neorectal function improved with time. The median 24-hour defecation frequency decreased from 15 (range 9 to 25) to 7 (range 4 to 10) at 11 months follow-up, and the median maximum tolerated volume increased to 157 (range 130 to 225) ml. Anal manometry and electrosensitivity were not affected by the surgery. Histologic biopsy samples after 1 year showed a normal small intestinal mucous membrane, without inflammation or fibrosis.

Conclusion: The combination of a low complication rate and good neorectal function at 1 year is a substantial improvement that justifies extension of the clinical application in patients with UC and FAP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Histologic examination of the neorectal resection specimen of a pig, showing a composite bowel wall with (1) perirectal fatty tissue, (2) muscularis propria of the rectum, (3) small intestinal submucosa and mucosa (hematoxylin and eosin stain).
None
Figure 2. Excision specimen 1 year after an INRA procedure in a pig, showing a normal ileorectal anastomosis with a compliant neorectum.
None
Figure 3. Rectal mucosectomy, surgical technique. Dentate line (1), circular and longitudinal rectal muscle layers (2), rectal mucosa (3).
None
Figure 4. Histology of rectal mucosectomy specimens. (A) A patient with UC. The dissection plane is invariably located beneath the submucosa, which is thickened, whereas the mucosa has been destroyed by the long-lasting colitis (hematoxylin & eosin stain, ×250). (B) A patient with FAP. The dissection plane is invariably located beneath the submucosa, and the polyps are completely removed.
None
Figure 5. Ileal mucosal sling formation, surgical technique. Ileal mucosa (1), vessels penetrating ileal wall (2), meshlike graft incisions (3).
None
Figure 6. The ileoneorectal anastomosis: anastomosis (3) between the ileum and proximal rectal muscular wall with the ileal mucosa sling (2) plugged on the denuded rectal muscle. The distal end is sutured to the dentate line (1). The central vascular pedicle is shown, as well as the mucosal fenestrations for drainage and increased luminal diameter.
None
Figure 7. Defecation frequency of INRA patients over time.
None
Figure 8. Maximum tolerated volume of the neorectum and its development over time after the INRA procedure.
None
Figure 9. Histology of the neorectal mucosa during follow-up after the INRA procedure. (1) At 1 week: normal length of the villi with a dense mixed inflammatory infiltrate and ulcerations. (2) At 6 weeks: subtotal villous atrophy with disappearance of the goblet cells and brush border. (3) At 3 months: partial villous atrophy with regeneration of goblet cells, enterocytes, and brush border, disappearance of the inflammatory infiltrate. (4) After 6 to 12 months: normal small intestinal mucous membrane without inflammatory infiltrate, normal length of villi, intact goblet cell population and brush border (hematoxylin and eosin stain, ×250).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978; 2: 85–88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church J, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses: complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 120–127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wexner SD, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. The ileo-anal reservoir. Am J Surg 1990; 159: 178–185. - PubMed
    1. Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 800–803. - PubMed
    1. Nicholls RJ. Restorative proctocolectomy with various types of reservoir. World J Surg 1987; 11: 751–762. - PubMed

Publication types