Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Dec;230(6):759-65; discussion 765-6.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199912000-00004.

Does the subspecialty of the surgeon performing primary colonic resection influence the outcome of patients with hepatic metastases referred for resection?

Affiliations

Does the subspecialty of the surgeon performing primary colonic resection influence the outcome of patients with hepatic metastases referred for resection?

S J Wigmore et al. Ann Surg. 1999 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To compare resection rates and outcome of patients subsequently referred with hepatic metastases whose initial colon cancers were resected by surgeons with different specialty interests.

Summary background data: Variation in practice among noncolorectal specialist surgeons has led to recommendations that colorectal cancers should be treated by surgeons trained in colorectal surgery or surgical oncology.

Methods: The resectability of metastases, the frequency and pattern of recurrence after resection, and the length of survival were compared in patients referred to a single center for resection of colorectal hepatic metastases. The patients were divided into those whose colorectal resection had been performed by general surgeons (GS) with other subspecialty interests (n = 108) or by colorectal specialists (CS; n = 122). RESULTS No differences were observed with respect to age, sex, tumor stage, site of primary tumor, or frequency of synchronous metastases. Comparing the GS group with the CS group, resectable disease was identified in 26% versus 66%, with tumor recurrence after a median follow-up of 19 months in 75% versus 44%, respectively. Recurrences involving bowel or lymph nodes accounted for 55% versus 24% of all recurrences, with respective median survivals of 14 months versus 26 months.

Conclusion: Fewer patients referred by general surgeons had resectable liver disease. After surgery, recurrent tumor was more likely to develop in the GS group; their overall outcome was worse than that of the CS group. This observation is partly explained by a lower local recurrence rate in the CS group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Number of patients referred for consideration of hepatic metastases whose colorectal surgery was performed by general surgeons (white bar; n = 108) and colorectal specialists (shaded bar; n = 122). Chi square test for trend = 17.8, degrees of freedom 4, p < 0.01.
None
Figure 2. Overall survival duration from date of confirmed diagnosis of hepatic metastases in patients referred for consideration of hepatic resection whose primary colorectal resection was performed by colorectal specialists (solid line) and general surgeons (dashed line). Log rank = 13.1, p < 0.0003.
None
Figure 3. Survival duration from date of confirmed diagnosis of hepatic metastases in patients whose primary colorectal procedures were performed by colorectal specialists and general surgeons. Patients are stratified into those who did and did not undergo hepatic resection. All liver resections were performed by hepatobiliary surgeons. Difference between survival in resected patients: log rank = 8.4, p < 0.01; no hepatic resection: NS.
None
Figure 4. Survival duration from date of confirmed diagnosis of hepatic metastases arising from primary rectal cancers in patients who underwent surgery performed by colorectal specialists (solid line) and general surgeons (dashed line). Log rank = 6.3, p < 0.012.
None
Figure 5. Survival duration from date of confirmed diagnosis of hepatic metastases arising from primary colon cancers in patients who underwent surgery performed by colorectal specialists (solid line) and general surgeons (dashed line). Log rank = 6, p < 0.015.

References

    1. Wagner JS, Adson MA, Van Heerden JA, et al. The natural history of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. A comparison with resective treatment. Ann Surg 1984; 199: 502–508. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnaud JP, Dumont P, Adloff M, et al. Natural history of colorectal carcinoma with untreated liver metastases. Surg Gastroenterol 1984; 3: 37–42. - PubMed
    1. Blumgart LH, Allison DJ. Resection and embolisation in the management of secondary hepatic tumors. World J Surg 1982; 6: 32–45. - PubMed
    1. Nordlinger B, Jaeck D, Guiguet M, et al. Surgical resection of hepatic metastases. Multicentric retrospective study by the French Association of Surgery. In: Nordlinger B, Jaeck D, eds. Treatment of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer. Paris: Springer-Verlag; 1992:129–146.
    1. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Gall FP. Indicators of prognosis after hepatic resection for colorectal secondaries. Surgery 1991; 110: 13–29. - PubMed