A comparison of subjective estimates of sleep with objective polysomnographic data in healthy men and women

Abstract

Twenty healthy men and women had their sleep recorded objectively, using polysomnography on 3 nonconsecutive nights. Following each night, the subjects assessed their sleep onset latency and number of awakenings, subjectively. Self-ratings were compared with objective measures of sleep onset latency (SOL), calculated as the time from lights-out to the first continuous minute of stage 2 sleep, and the number of awakenings which lasted 1 minute or longer on the polysomnograms. Apart from the first night, the subjects overestimated the time that it took them to fall asleep, despite sleep onset being scored as the latency to stage 2, rather than stage 1 sleep. On all 3 nights, the subjects underestimated the number of awakenings when compared to objective criteria. Although the subjects were consistent in their errors of estimation of their sleep compared to polysomnographic assessments over the three nights, the between-individual variation was large, so that objective and subjective ratings of SOL and awakenings were not correlated. The young men and women in our study, who were free of medication or sleep complaints, perceived their sleep inaccurately when compared to objective polysomnographic recordings.