A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision
- PMID: 10617731
A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision
Abstract
Background: The risks associated with newborn circumcision have not been as extensively evaluated as the benefits.
Objectives: The goals of this study were threefold: 1) to derive a population-based complication rate for newborn circumcision; 2) to calculate the number needed to harm for newborn circumcision based on this rate; and 3) to establish trade-offs based on our complication rates and published estimates of the benefits of circumcision including the prevention of urinary tract infections and penile cancer.
Methods: Using the Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System for Washington State, we retrospectively examined routine newborn circumcisions performed over 9 years (1987-1996). We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes to identify both circumcisions and complications and limited our analyses to children without other surgical procedures performed during their initial birth hospitalization.
Results: Of 354, 297 male infants born during the study period, 130,475 (37%) were circumcised during their newborn stay. Overall 287 (.2%) of circumcised children and 33 (.01%) of uncircumcised children had complications potentially associated with circumcision coded as a discharge diagnosis. Based on our findings, a complication can be expected in 1 out every 476 circumcisions. Six urinary tract infections can be prevented for every complication endured and almost 2 complications can be expected for every case of penile cancer prevented.
Conclusions: Circumcision remains a relatively safe procedure. However, for some parents, the risks we report may outweigh the potential benefits. This information may help parents seeking guidance to make an informed decision.
Comment in
-
A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision.Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4 Suppl):954. Pediatrics. 2000. PMID: 11183873 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Male circumcision.Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 22926175
-
Neonatal circumcision revisited. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society.CMAJ. 1996 Mar 15;154(6):769-80. CMAJ. 1996. PMID: 8634956 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neonatal circumcision.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;48(6):1539-57. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70390-4. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11732129 Review.
-
Circumcision in children beyond the neonatal period.Pediatrics. 1993 Dec;92(6):791-3. Pediatrics. 1993. PMID: 8233738
-
Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection.Lancet. 1998 Dec 5;352(9143):1813-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02392-7. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9851381
Cited by
-
A 'snip' in time: what is the best age to circumcise?BMC Pediatr. 2012 Feb 28;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-20. BMC Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22373281 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Foreskin development in 10 421 Chinese boys aged 0-18 years.World J Pediatr. 2009 Nov;5(4):312-5. doi: 10.1007/s12519-009-0060-z. Epub 2009 Nov 13. World J Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 19911150
-
Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.BMC Urol. 2010 Feb 16;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-10-2. BMC Urol. 2010. PMID: 20158883 Free PMC article.
-
[Current and practice-relevant news from pediatric urology].Urologe A. 2011 Sep;50 Suppl 1:201-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2679-3. Urologe A. 2011. PMID: 21837487 Review. German.
-
Acceptability of early infant male circumcision among Chinese parents: strategy implications of HIV prevention for China.BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 4;12:738. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-738. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22946988 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical