Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Feb;14(2):97-102.
doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00056-4.

Braces do not reduce loads on internal spinal fixation devices

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Braces do not reduce loads on internal spinal fixation devices

A Rohlmann et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1999 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of a brace or harness on loads on internal spinal fixation devices.

Design: The implant loads were measured in vivo using telemeterized internal spinal fixators.

Background: Only limited information exists regarding the load reduction due to a brace or harness.

Methods: A Boston overlap brace, a reclination brace, and a lumbotrain harness were examined to determine how they affect the loads on internal spinal fixation devices. The implant loads were measured using telemeterized fixators in six patients for several positions and activities, including sitting, standing, walking, bending forward, and lifting an extended leg in a supine position.

Results: None of the braces studied were able to markedly reduce the loads on the fixators. Frequently even higher fixator loads were measured when wearing a brace or harness.

Conclusions: It does not seem helpful to brace patients after mono- or bisegmental stabilization of the lumbar spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources