Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1999 Jul:175:12-6.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.1.12.

Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression. Double-blind, randomised comparison

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression. Double-blind, randomised comparison

M F Poirier et al. Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Jul.

Erratum in

  • Br J Psychiatry 1999 Oct;175:394

Abstract

Background: About one-third of patients fail to respond to initial antidepressant therapy, which suggests a need for more effective drugs.

Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine and paroxetine in 122 patients with non-chronic treatment-resistant depression.

Method: In-patients or out-patients satisfying DSM-III-R criteria for major depression in evolution for less than eight months, having a baseline HAM-D score > or = 18 and a HAM-D Item 3 score < 3 were eligible. Patients were required to have a history of resistance to two previous antidepressant treatments and a CGI improvement score of 3 at the beginning of treatment. Doses were adjusted to 200-300 mg/day for venlafaxine and 30-40 mg/day for paroxetine.

Results: For the observed-case analysis, the response rate was 51.9% for venlafaxine and 32.7% for paroxetine (P = 0.044), and a remission was achieved in 42.3% of venlafaxine-treated and 20.0% of paroxetine-treated patients (P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable between treatment groups.

Conclusions: Venlafaxine showed some evidence of superiority to paroxetine in this difficult-to-treat patient population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in