Difficulties with anonymous shortlisting of medical school applications and its effects on candidates with non-European names: prospective cohort study

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of anonymous shortlisting of applications for medical school and its effect on those with non-European names.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Leeds school of medicine, United Kingdom.

Subjects: 2047 applications for 1998 entry from the United Kingdom and the European Union.

Intervention: Deletion of all references to name and nationality from the application form.

Main outcome measures: Scoring by two admissions tutors at shortlisting.

Results: Deleting names was cumbersome as some were repeated up to 15 times. Anonymising application forms was ineffective as one admissions tutor was able to identify nearly 50% of candidates classed as being from an ethnic minority group. Although scores were lower for applicants with non-European names, anonymity did not improve scores. Applicants with non-European names who were identified as such by tutors were significantly less likely to drop marks in one particular non-academic area (the career insight component) than their European counterparts.

Conclusions: There was no evidence of benefit to candidates with non-European names of attempting to blind assessment. Anonymising application forms cannot be recommended.

Figure 1

Distribution of total scores at shortlising for all applicants for entry in 1998 according to study groups

Figure 2

Comparison of scores awarded blind and open for each of subgroups defined by surname