Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1999 Dec;88(432):33-5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb01153.x.

Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: present and future

Affiliations
Review

Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: present and future

B Wilcken et al. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 1999 Dec.

Abstract

Despite there being effective tests for detecting cystic fibrosis (CF) using newborn screening blood samples, screening in neonates has not had universal approval because of uncertainty about its benefits. After up to 18 y experience, at a recent conference in Caen several aspects attracted universal agreement. There is still major delay in clinical diagnosis after the onset of symptoms. There is short-term benefit in early diagnosis by screening, with reduced morbidity in the first 2 y, evidence of significant nutritional benefits up to the age of 10 y, and probable respiratory benefit over this time frame. There is great potential for research into treatment modalities and no evidence of significant psychological harm to CF babies from early diagnosis. With a screening protocol that includes a DNA test there is some unwanted carrier detection and careful genetic counselling is needed. There is no evidence yet that screening will extend the life of CF patients, so some doubts remain as to its overall effectiveness, and there have been no good studies on comparative costs in screened and unscreened cohorts. Even so, the weight of evidence suggests very worthwhile advantages for screened babies and their families. Because of this, it is unlikely that further trials will take place. It may be that the onus now is on those who do not support screening to justify this stance to parents who may favour it.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources