[Evolution and quality of care during labor and delivery in primiparous patients who underwent early obstetrical analgesia]
- PMID: 10630057
[Evolution and quality of care during labor and delivery in primiparous patients who underwent early obstetrical analgesia]
Abstract
Evaluations of labor and delivery progress and care quality in primiparous patients that receive obstetric analgesia by peridural way at the beginning of the active phase, was done. One-hundred-twenty-nine patients at the beginning of the active phase of the labor were randomized into two groups: Group I: Sixty-six patients that received obstetric analgesia by peridural way and Group II: Sixty-three patients did not receive analgesia by any way. Length of the cervical dilation and effacement, and expulsive period, cervical dilation rate per hour, delivery type, labor experience and perinatal outcomes were measured. The length means of the cervical dilation and effacement was 177.7 (SD +/- 89.0) and 296.0 (SD +/- 114.5) minutes to Group I and II respectively (p < 0.005). Cervical dilation rate was 2.74 and 1.6 centimeters per hour to Group I and II respectively (p < 0.05). The length of the expulsive period was 36.54 minutes (SD +/- 21.7) to Group I and 42.57 minutes (SD +/- 16.15) to Group II (p > 0.05). Labor experience was referred like very painful in the 9% and 100% to Group I and II respectively (p < 0.05). The perinatal outcomes and method of delivery were similar between two groups. Obstetric analgesia administered by peridural way at the beginning of the active phase of the labor significantly reduce the dilation and effacement period and whole labor, without modify the expulsive period length. It does not inhibit the uterine activity and improvement the care quality of the labor.
Similar articles
-
Subarachnoid analgesia in advanced labor: a comparison of subarachnoid analgesia and pudendal block in advanced labor: analgesic quality and obstetric outcome.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Dec;1034:356-63. doi: 10.1196/annals.1335.037. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004. PMID: 15731325 Clinical Trial.
-
Local anesthetics and mode of delivery: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine.Anesth Analg. 2007 Sep;105(3):756-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278131.73472.f4. Anesth Analg. 2007. PMID: 17717236 Clinical Trial.
-
Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?J Clin Anesth. 2009 Mar;21(2):94-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.06.020. J Clin Anesth. 2009. PMID: 19329011
-
Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction.Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):301-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171109.53832.8d. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 16055579 Clinical Trial.
-
The Evolution of the Laborist.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):625-629. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.001. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 29078944 Review.
Cited by
-
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29781504 Free PMC article.
-
Epidural analgesia during labor vs no analgesia: A comparative study.Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;6(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.93055. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 22412775 Free PMC article.