Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Jan 15;320(7228):155-60.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7228.155.

Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests

W Graham  1 , P Smith, A Kamal, A Fitzmaurice, N Smith, N Hamilton
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests

W Graham et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of touch screen system with information leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests.

Design: Randomised controlled trial; participants allocated to intervention group (given access to touch screen and leaflet information) or control group (leaflet information only).

Setting: Antenatal clinic in university teaching hospital.

Subjects: 875 women booking antenatal care.

Interventions: All participants received a leaflet providing information on prenatal tests. Women in the intervention arm also had access to touch screen information system in antenatal clinic.

Main outcome measures: Women's informed decision making on prenatal testing as measured by their uptake of and understanding of the purpose of specific tests; their satisfaction with information provided; and their levels of anxiety.

Results: All women in the trial had a good baseline knowledge of prenatal tests. Women in the intervention group did not show any greater understanding of the purpose of the tests than control women. However, uptake of detailed anomaly scans was significantly higher in intervention group than the control group (94% (351/375) v 87% (310/358), P=0.0014). Levels of anxiety among nulliparous women in intervention group declined significantly over time (P<0.001).

Conclusions: The touch screen seemed to convey no benefit over well prepared leaflets in improving understanding of prenatal tests among the pregnant women. It did, however, seem to reduce levels of anxiety and may be most effective for providing information to selected women who have a relevant adverse history or abnormal results from tests in their current pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Menu display of options available on touch screen system. (Other views of system are available on the BMJ's website)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Extract from questionnaire used to assess women's understanding of prenatal tests
Figure 3
Figure 3
Progress of participants through trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Department of Health. The patient's charter. London: HMSO; 1991.
    1. Peckham M. Research and development for the National Health Service. Lancet. 1991;338:367–371. - PubMed
    1. Oliver S, Rajan L, Turner H, Oakley A, Entwistle V, Watt I, et al. Informed choice for users of health services: views on ultrasonography leaflets of women in early pregnancy, midwives, and ultrasonographers. BMJ. 1996;313:1251–1253. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dezateux C, Peckham C. Testing times for pregnant women. Lancet. 1998;352(suppl IV):24. - PubMed
    1. Marteau T, Slack J, Kidd J, Shaw R. Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal practice observed. Public Health. 1992;106:131–141. - PubMed

Publication types